Suppr超能文献

成人院外心脏骤停的目标温度管理:当前概念和临床应用。

Targeted temperature management for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: current concepts and clinical applications.

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655 Japan.

出版信息

J Intensive Care. 2016 Apr 27;4:30. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0139-2. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Targeted temperature management (TTM) (primarily therapeutic hypothermia (TH)) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been considered effective, especially for adult-witnessed OHCA with a shockable initial rhythm, based on pathophysiology and on several clinical studies (especially two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in 2002). However, a recently published large RCT comparing TTM at 33 °C (TH) and TTM at 36 °C (normothermia) showed no advantage of 33 °C over 36 °C. Thus, this RCT has complicated the decision to perform TH after cardiac arrest. The results of this RCT are sometimes interpreted fever control alone is sufficient to improve outcomes after cardiac arrest because fever control was not strictly performed in the control groups of the previous two RCTs that showed an advantage for TH. Although this may be possible, another interpretation that the optimal target temperature for TH is much lower than 33 °C may be also possible. Additionally, there are many points other than target temperature that are unknown, such as the optimal timing to initiate TTM, the period between OHCA and initiating TTM, the period between OHCA and achieving the target temperature, the duration of maintaining the target temperature, the TTM technique, the rewarming method, and the management protocol after rewarming. RCTs are currently underway to shed light on several of these underexplored issues. In the present review, we examine how best to perform TTM after cardiac arrest based on the available evidence.

摘要

目标温度管理(TTM)(主要是治疗性低体温(TH))在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后被认为是有效的,特别是对于有目击的成人 OHCA 伴有可除颤的初始节律,这基于病理生理学和几项临床研究(特别是 2002 年发表的两项随机对照试验(RCT))。然而,最近发表的一项比较 33°C(TH)和 36°C(正常体温)TTM 的大型 RCT 并未显示 33°C 优于 36°C。因此,这项 RCT 使心脏骤停后进行 TH 的决策变得复杂。这项 RCT 的结果有时被解释为单独控制发热就足以改善心脏骤停后的结果,因为在前两项 RCT 中,对照组并未严格进行 TH,这两项 RCT 显示 TH 有优势。尽管这是可能的,但另一种解释是 TH 的最佳目标温度远低于 33°C 也是可能的。此外,还有许多其他未知的因素,例如开始 TTM 的最佳时机、OHCA 与开始 TTM 之间的时间间隔、OHCA 与达到目标温度之间的时间间隔、维持目标温度的时间、TTM 技术、复温方法和复温后的管理方案。目前正在进行 RCT 以阐明其中的一些研究不足的问题。在本综述中,我们根据现有证据探讨如何最好地在心脏骤停后进行 TTM。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce66/4847228/b2af319746ad/40560_2016_139_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验