From the Departments of *Nuclear Medicine, and †Surgery, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan.
Clin Nucl Med. 2016 Aug;41(8):606-13. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001237.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall and progression-free survival of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), comparing the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guideline for risk of recurrence with the TNM staging system with dynamic assessment at 2 years.
This study is a retrospective analysis of 689 PTC patients over a 20-year period at a single center. Disease-free survival based on the TNM staging and ATA recurrence risk was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Dynamic response assessment during the first 2 years was compared for both systems. Survival was calculated based on age, baseline resectability, and postthyroidectomy serum tumor marker levels.
Six hundred eighty-nine (72.2%) of the total thyroid cancer patients had PTC. Four hundred sixty-nine patients were females, and 220 patients were males. The age range was 6 to 87 years. Five hundred thirty-five patients were resectable, and 56 patients were unresectable. One hundred fifty-one patients were excluded due to insufficient information on recurrence risk. By ATA categorization, 39% had low risk, no disease-related mortality; 44% had intermediate risk, 3 died; and 17% had high risk, 32 died. The 5-year disease-free survival was 54%, 26%, and 5% in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. The log-rank test showed a significant difference in the percent survival (P < 0.01). TNM stage wise, in terms of survival, 1.3% in stage I, 2.2% in stage II, 0% in stage III, and 37.5% in stage IV died. The 20-year disease-free survival showed the following: stage I, 43%; stage II, 28%; stage III, 18%; and stage IV, 2%. There is significant difference in survival rate (P < 0.01). Both ATA risk classification and TNM staging were significant predictors of disease-free survival. On bivariate analysis, ATA classification (hazards ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-2.67; P = 0.001) was better predictive of overall survival versus TNM classification (hazards ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.43; P = 0.063).
The ATA risk stratification and continuous reassessment during the first 2 years predicts disease-free survival better than the TNM staging. Age older than 45 years, unresectable disease, and elevated postthyroidectomy thyroglobulin levels dictate a poorer prognosis.
本研究旨在评估甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的总生存率和无进展生存率,比较美国甲状腺协会(ATA)复发风险指南与 2 年时动态评估的 TNM 分期系统。
这是一项在单中心进行的为期 20 年的 689 例 PTC 患者的回顾性分析。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线计算基于 TNM 分期和 ATA 复发风险的无病生存率。比较两种系统在最初 2 年内的动态反应评估。根据年龄、基线可切除性和甲状腺切除术后血清肿瘤标志物水平计算生存率。
689 例甲状腺癌患者中 689 例(72.2%)为 PTC。469 例为女性,220 例为男性。年龄范围为 6 至 87 岁。535 例为可切除性,56 例为不可切除性。由于缺乏复发风险的足够信息,151 例被排除在外。ATA 分类显示,39%为低风险,无疾病相关死亡率;44%为中危,3 例死亡;17%为高危,32 例死亡。5 年无病生存率分别为低危组 54%、中危组 26%和高危组 5%。对数秩检验显示两组生存率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。TNM 分期方面,生存率分别为 I 期 1.3%、II 期 2.2%、III 期 0%和 IV 期 37.5%。20 年无病生存率分别为 I 期 43%、II 期 28%、III 期 18%和 IV 期 2%。生存率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。ATA 风险分类和 TNM 分期均是无病生存率的显著预测因素。在单变量分析中,ATA 分类(风险比,2.1;95%置信区间,1.64-2.67;P=0.001)优于 TNM 分类(风险比,1.3;95%置信区间,1.11-1.43;P=0.063)预测总生存率。
ATA 风险分层和最初 2 年内的连续重新评估比 TNM 分期更能预测无病生存率。年龄大于 45 岁、不可切除性疾病和甲状腺切除术后升高的甲状腺球蛋白水平预示着预后更差。