• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会性昆虫群落中任务组织的动力学模型。

Dynamical Models of Task Organization in Social Insect Colonies.

作者信息

Kang Yun, Theraulaz Guy

机构信息

Sciences and Mathematics Faculty, College of Letters and Sciences, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ, 85212, USA.

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paul Sabatier (UPS), 31062, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.

出版信息

Bull Math Biol. 2016 May;78(5):879-915. doi: 10.1007/s11538-016-0165-1. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11538-016-0165-1
PMID:27125656
Abstract

The organizations of insect societies, such as division of labor, task allocation, collective regulation, mass action responses, have been considered as main reasons for the ecological success. In this article, we propose and study a general modeling framework that includes the following three features: (a) the average internal response threshold for each task (the internal factor); (b) social network communications that could lead to task switching (the environmental factor); and (c) dynamical changes of task demands (the external factor). Since workers in many social insect species exhibit age polyethism, we also extend our model to incorporate age polyethism in which worker task preferences change with age. We apply our general modeling framework to the cases of two task groups: the inside colony task versus the outside colony task. Our analytical study of the models provides important insights and predictions on the effects of colony size, social communication, and age-related task preferences on task allocation and division of labor in the adaptive dynamical environment. Our study implies that the smaller size colony invests its resource for the colony growth and allocates more workers in the risky tasks such as foraging while the larger colony shifts more workers to perform the safer tasks inside the colony. Social interactions among different task groups play an important role in shaping task allocation depending on the relative cost and demands of the tasks.

摘要

昆虫群体的组织形式,如分工、任务分配、集体调控、群体行动反应等,被认为是其在生态上取得成功的主要原因。在本文中,我们提出并研究了一个通用的建模框架,该框架包括以下三个特征:(a)每个任务的平均内部反应阈值(内部因素);(b)可能导致任务转换的社交网络通信(环境因素);以及(c)任务需求的动态变化(外部因素)。由于许多社会性昆虫物种的工蚁表现出年龄多态性,我们还扩展了模型以纳入年龄多态性,即工蚁的任务偏好随年龄变化。我们将通用建模框架应用于两个任务组的情况:蚁群内部任务与蚁群外部任务。我们对模型的分析研究为蚁群大小、社交通信以及与年龄相关的任务偏好对适应性动态环境中的任务分配和分工的影响提供了重要见解和预测。我们的研究表明,较小规模的蚁群将资源投入到蚁群生长中,并在诸如觅食等风险任务中分配更多工蚁,而较大的蚁群则将更多工蚁转移到蚁群内部执行更安全的任务。不同任务组之间的社会互动在根据任务的相对成本和需求塑造任务分配方面起着重要作用。

相似文献

1
Dynamical Models of Task Organization in Social Insect Colonies.社会性昆虫群落中任务组织的动力学模型。
Bull Math Biol. 2016 May;78(5):879-915. doi: 10.1007/s11538-016-0165-1. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
2
Dynamics of task allocation in social insect colonies: scaling effects of colony size versus work activities.社会昆虫群体中的任务分配动态:群体规模与工作活动的尺度效应。
J Math Biol. 2021 Mar 29;82(5):42. doi: 10.1007/s00285-021-01589-z.
3
Influence of caste polyethism on longevity of workers in social insect colonies.等级多态性对社会性昆虫群落中工蚁寿命的影响。
J Theor Biol. 2006 Feb 7;238(3):527-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.06.008. Epub 2005 Jul 20.
4
Nutritional regulation influencing colony dynamics and task allocations in social insect colonies.营养调控对社会性昆虫群体的群体动态和任务分配的影响。
J Biol Dyn. 2021 May;15(sup1):S35-S61. doi: 10.1080/17513758.2020.1786859. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
5
Costs of task allocation with local feedback: Effects of colony size and extra workers in social insects and other multi-agent systems.具有局部反馈的任务分配成本:蚁群规模和额外工蚁对社会性昆虫及其他多智能体系统的影响
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Dec 14;13(12):e1005904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005904. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
A modeling framework for adaptive collective defense: crisis response in social-insect colonies.自适应集体防御建模框架:昆虫社会群体的危机应对。
J Math Biol. 2023 Nov 15;87(6):87. doi: 10.1007/s00285-023-01995-5.
7
Social inhibition and the regulation of temporal polyethism in honey bees.蜜蜂的社会抑制与时间多态行为的调控
J Theor Biol. 2001 Dec 7;213(3):461-79. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2427.
8
Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies.个体复杂性与社会复杂性,尤其以蚁群为例
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 May;76(2):211-37. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005656.
9
Dynamics of Information Flow and Task Allocation of Social Insect Colonies: Impacts of Spatial Interactions and Task Switching.社会昆虫群体的信息流和任务分配动态:空间相互作用和任务转换的影响。
Bull Math Biol. 2024 Apr 6;86(5):50. doi: 10.1007/s11538-024-01280-6.
10
Regulation of division of labor in insects: a colony-level perspective.昆虫分工的调控:从群体水平看。
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2024 Feb;61:101155. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2023.101155. Epub 2023 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal organization of ant foraging from a complex systems perspective.从复杂系统的角度看蚂蚁觅食的时空组织。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 4;14(1):12801. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63307-1.
2
Social Learning versus Individual Learning in the Division of Labour.劳动分工中的社会学习与个体学习
Biology (Basel). 2023 May 19;12(5):740. doi: 10.3390/biology12050740.
3
Explaining workers' inactivity in social colonies from first principles.从基本原则上解释社会群体中工人的不活跃性。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Jan;20(198):20220808. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0808. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
When being flexible matters: Ecological underpinnings for the evolution of collective flexibility and task allocation.当灵活性至关重要时:集体灵活性和任务分配演变的生态基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 3;119(18):e2116066119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116066119. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
5
Movement, Encounter Rate, and Collective Behavior in Ant Colonies.蚁群中的运动、相遇率和集体行为。
Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2020 Nov 12;114(5):541-546. doi: 10.1093/aesa/saaa036. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
How Approaches to Animal Swarm Intelligence Can Improve the Study of Collective Intelligence in Human Teams.动物群体智能的研究方法如何促进人类团队集体智能的研究。
J Intell. 2020 Mar 2;8(1):9. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8010009.