• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠脉综合征存活患者院前及院内医疗资源的使用情况:EPICOR注册研究分析

Prehospital and in-hospital use of healthcare resources in patients surviving acute coronary syndromes: an analysis of the EPICOR registry.

作者信息

Annemans Lieven, Danchin Nicolas, Van de Werf Frans, Pocock Stuart, Licour Muriel, Medina Jesús, Bueno Héctor

机构信息

Department of Public Health , I-CHER Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.

Département de Cardiologie , Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou & Université René Descartes , Paris , France.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2016 Feb 24;3(1):e000347. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000347. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2015-000347
PMID:27127635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4847130/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this report is to provide insight into real-world healthcare resource use (HCRU) during the critical management of patients surviving acute coronary syndromes (ACS), using data from EPICOR (long-tErm follow-up of antithrombotic management Patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients) (NCT01171404).

METHODS

EPICOR was a prospective, multinational, observational study that enrolled 10 568 ACS survivors from 555 hospitals in 20 countries in Europe and Latin America, between September 2010 and March 2011. HCRU was evaluated in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS), with or without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Multivariable analysis was performed to determine factors that affected resource use.

RESULTS

Before hospitalisation, more patients with STEMI than with NSTE-ACS had their first ECG (44.1% vs 36.4%, p<0.0001) and received antithrombotic medication (26.6% vs 15.2%, p<0.0001). Patients with NSTE-ACS with prior CVD were less likely than those without to be catheterised (73.1% vs 82.8%, p<0.0001). More patients with STEMI than with NSTE-ACS had percutaneous coronary intervention (77.1% vs 54.9%, p<0.0001), but fewer underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (1.2% vs 3.7%, p<0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that resource use, including length of hospital stay and coronary revascularisation, was significantly influenced by multiple factors, including ACS type, site characteristics and region (all p≤0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large-scale, real-life study, findings were generally in line with clinical logic, although site characteristics and region still significantly affected resource use. Moreover, and unexpectedly, resource use tended to be slightly higher in patients without a history of CVD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01171404 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

摘要

目的

本报告旨在利用EPICOR(急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗血栓治疗模式的长期随访研究)(NCT01171404)的数据,深入了解急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)存活患者在关键治疗阶段的实际医疗资源使用(HCRU)情况。

方法

EPICOR是一项前瞻性、跨国、观察性研究,于2010年9月至2011年3月期间,纳入了来自欧洲和拉丁美洲20个国家555家医院的10568名ACS存活患者。对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)或非ST段抬高型ACS(NSTE-ACS)患者,无论有无心血管疾病(CVD)病史,均进行医疗资源使用评估。进行多变量分析以确定影响资源使用的因素。

结果

在住院前,STEMI患者比NSTE-ACS患者进行首次心电图检查的比例更高(44.1%对36.4%,p<0.0001),接受抗血栓药物治疗的比例也更高(26.6%对15.2%,p<0.0001)。有CVD病史的NSTE-ACS患者接受导管插入术的可能性低于无CVD病史的患者(73.1%对82.8%,p<0.0001)。STEMI患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比例高于NSTE-ACS患者(77.1%对54.9%,p<0.0001),但接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的比例低于NSTE-ACS患者(1.2%对3.7%,p<0.0001)。多变量分析表明,包括住院时间和冠状动脉血运重建在内的资源使用受到多种因素的显著影响,包括ACS类型、医院特征和地区(所有p≤0.05)。

结论

在这项大规模的现实生活研究中,研究结果总体上符合临床逻辑,尽管医院特征和地区仍对资源使用有显著影响。此外,出乎意料的是,无CVD病史患者的资源使用往往略高。

试验注册号

NCT01171404(ClinicalTrials.gov)。

相似文献

1
Prehospital and in-hospital use of healthcare resources in patients surviving acute coronary syndromes: an analysis of the EPICOR registry.急性冠脉综合征存活患者院前及院内医疗资源的使用情况:EPICOR注册研究分析
Open Heart. 2016 Feb 24;3(1):e000347. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000347. eCollection 2016.
2
Long-Term Outcome of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients on Chronic Oral Anticoagulants: Data from the EPICOR Study.长期口服抗凝剂患者急性冠状动脉综合征的结局:来自 EPICOR 研究的数据。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2020;18(1):92-99. doi: 10.2174/1570161117666181227122355.
3
Current patterns of antithrombotic and revascularisation therapy in patients hospitalised for acute coronary syndromes. Data from the Polish subset of the EPICOR study.急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者的抗血栓形成和血运重建治疗现状。来自EPICOR研究波兰子集的数据。
Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(5):445-452. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0034. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
4
Predictors of one-year mortality at hospital discharge after acute coronary syndromes: A new risk score from the EPICOR (long-tErm follow uP of antithrombotic management patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients) study.急性冠脉综合征患者出院后一年死亡率的预测因素:来自EPICOR(急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗栓治疗模式的长期随访)研究的新风险评分。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Dec;4(6):509-17. doi: 10.1177/2048872614554198. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
5
Guideline-adherent therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The EPICOR registry in Germany.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的指南依从性治疗。德国的EPICOR注册研究。
Herz. 2015 Mar;40 Suppl 1:27-35. doi: 10.1007/s00059-014-4161-7. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
6
EPICOR (long-tErm follow-up of antithrombotic management Patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients) study: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics.EPICOR(急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗栓治疗模式的长期随访研究):研究背景、设计和基线特征。
Am Heart J. 2013 Jan;165(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.018. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
7
Contemporary inter-hospital transfer patterns for the management of acute coronary syndrome patients: findings from the EPICOR study.急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理的当代医院间转运模式:EPICOR研究结果
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Jun;4(3):254-62. doi: 10.1177/2048872614551544. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
8
[Trend of clinical features in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing emergent percutaneous coronary intervention].[接受急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征趋势]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 24;46(10):790-794. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.10.005.
9
Predictors of all-cause mortality and ischemic events within and beyond 1 year after an acute coronary syndrome: Results from the EPICOR registry.急性冠状动脉综合征后1年内及以后全因死亡率和缺血性事件的预测因素:EPICOR注册研究结果
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Jan;42(1):111-119. doi: 10.1002/clc.23116. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
10
Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics of the EPICOR Asia Study (Long-tErm follow-uP of antithrombotic management patterns In Acute CORonary Syndrome patients in Asia).亚太地区急性冠脉综合征患者抗栓治疗管理模式长期随访(EPICOR Asia)研究的原理、设计及基线特征
Clin Cardiol. 2015 Sep;38(9):511-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.22431. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of care for patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction before COVID-19 pandemic in Cuba: review of 17 reports with 7823 patients.新冠疫情大流行前古巴 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的护理质量:对 17 项报告 7823 例患者的回顾。
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2023 Dec 26;80(4):538-558. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v80.n4.42094.
2
Long-Term Antithrombotic Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Renal Impairment: Insights from EPICOR and EPICOR Asia.急性冠状动脉综合征合并肾功能不全患者的长期抗血栓治疗与临床结局:来自 EPICOR 和 EPICOR Asia 的研究结果。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021 Jul;21(4):471-482. doi: 10.1007/s40256-020-00447-5. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Translation of acute coronary syndrome therapies: from evidence to routine clinical practice.急性冠状动脉综合征治疗方法的翻译:从证据到常规临床实践
Am Heart J. 2015 Feb;169(2):266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
2
Opportunities for improvement in anti-thrombotic therapy and other strategies for the management of acute coronary syndromes: Insights from EPICOR, an international study of current practice patterns.抗血栓治疗及急性冠状动脉综合征其他管理策略的改进机会:来自EPICOR的见解,一项关于当前实践模式的国际研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016 Feb;5(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/2048872614565912. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
3
Sex differences in presenting symptoms of acute coronary syndrome: the EPIHeart cohort study.
急性冠状动脉综合征症状表现的性别差异:EPIHeart队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 23;8(2):e018798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018798.
Predictors of one-year mortality at hospital discharge after acute coronary syndromes: A new risk score from the EPICOR (long-tErm follow uP of antithrombotic management patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients) study.
急性冠脉综合征患者出院后一年死亡率的预测因素:来自EPICOR(急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗栓治疗模式的长期随访)研究的新风险评分。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Dec;4(6):509-17. doi: 10.1177/2048872614554198. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
4
Contemporary inter-hospital transfer patterns for the management of acute coronary syndrome patients: findings from the EPICOR study.急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理的当代医院间转运模式:EPICOR研究结果
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Jun;4(3):254-62. doi: 10.1177/2048872614551544. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
5
Global perspective on acute coronary syndrome: a burden on the young and poor.全球视角下的急性冠状动脉综合征:年轻人和贫困人口的负担。
Circ Res. 2014 Jun 6;114(12):1959-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302782.
6
Patient education after acute myocardial infarction: cardiologists should adapt their message--French registry of acute ST-elevation or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction 2010 registry.急性心肌梗死后的患者教育:心脏病专家应调整其信息——2010年法国急性ST段抬高型或非ST段抬高型心肌梗死注册研究
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015 Nov;16(11):761-7. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000092.
7
Euro Heart Survey 2009 Snapshot: regional variations in presentation and management of patients with AMI in 47 countries.欧洲心脏调查 2009 快照:47 个国家中 AMI 患者的表现和管理的区域差异。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Dec;2(4):359-70. doi: 10.1177/2048872613497341. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
8
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2013 Jan 29;127(4):e362-425. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
9
EPICOR (long-tErm follow-up of antithrombotic management Patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients) study: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics.EPICOR(急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗栓治疗模式的长期随访研究):研究背景、设计和基线特征。
Am Heart J. 2013 Jan;165(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.018. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
10
Guideline adherence after ST-segment elevation versus non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死后的指南遵循情况
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):654-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963959. Epub 2012 Sep 4.