• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性肢体缺血血管内血运重建术后的长期随访——一项回顾性单中心队列研究

Long-term follow-up after endovascular revascularisation for acute limb ischaemia--a retrospective single-centre cohort.

作者信息

Johner Fabian, Clemens Robert, Husmann Marc, Thalhammer Christoph, Seifert Burkhardt, Amann-Vesti Beatrice

机构信息

1 Clinic for Angiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

2 Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Vasa. 2016;45(3):247-52. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000532.

DOI:10.1024/0301-1526/a000532
PMID:27129071
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the long-term outcome after endovascular revascularisation for acute limb ischaemia (ALI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a prospectively maintained database, 318 endovascular interventions for ALI were identified between 2004 and 2010. Event history and survival were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Endpoints were target vessel revascularisation (TVR), non-target extremity revascularisation (NTER), amputation, major vascular events, coronary artery revascularisation and amputation-free survival.

RESULTS

Follow-up data of 303 patients (mean age 68.5 ± 12.7 years, 40% female) were available. The mean follow-up time was 38.7 ± 26.2 months. TVR was performed in 40.1 ± 2.9% at 1 year and 66.5 ± 3.8% at 5 years. NTER at 1 and 5 years were 7.1 ± 1.5% and 29.2 ± 4%, respectively. The proportion of patients who needed major or minor amputation was 4.3 ± 1.2% after 1 year and 9 ± 2.1% after 5 years. Amputation-free survival at 1 year was 90.3 ± 1.8% and 74.8 ± 3.2% at 5 years. Coronary artery disease (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.7, p = 0.002) and atrial fibrillation (HR 2.56, % CI 1.3 to 5.04, p = 0.007) were independently associated with a worse amputation-free survival. The cumulative proportion surviving one year following acute limb ischemia was 95.4 ± 1.2% and 79.7 ± 3.1% after 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term amputation-free survival after successful revascularisation for ALI is high; negative predictors are coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation.

摘要

背景

我们评估了急性肢体缺血(ALI)血管内血运重建后的长期疗效。

患者和方法

从一个前瞻性维护的数据库中,确定了2004年至2010年间318例针对ALI的血管内干预。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox回归分析事件史和生存率。终点指标为靶血管血运重建(TVR)、非靶肢体血运重建(NTER)、截肢、主要血管事件、冠状动脉血运重建和无截肢生存率。

结果

获得了303例患者(平均年龄68.5±12.7岁,40%为女性)的随访数据。平均随访时间为38.7±26.2个月。1年时TVR的发生率为40.1±2.9%,5年时为66.5±3.8%。1年和5年时NTER的发生率分别为7.1±1.5%和29.2±4%。1年后需要进行大截肢或小截肢的患者比例为4.3±1.2%,5年后为9±2.1%。1年时无截肢生存率为90.3±1.8%,5年时为74.8±3.2%。冠状动脉疾病(HR 2.22,95%CI 1.33至3.7,p = 0.002)和心房颤动(HR 2.56,95%CI 1.3至5.04,p = 0.007)与较差的无截肢生存率独立相关。急性肢体缺血后1年的累积生存率为95.4±1.2%,5年后为79.7±3.1%。

结论

ALI成功血运重建后的长期无截肢生存率较高;负性预测因素为冠状动脉疾病和心房颤动。

相似文献

1
Long-term follow-up after endovascular revascularisation for acute limb ischaemia--a retrospective single-centre cohort.急性肢体缺血血管内血运重建术后的长期随访——一项回顾性单中心队列研究
Vasa. 2016;45(3):247-52. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000532.
2
Contemporary outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute limb ischemia.急性肢体缺血血管内介入治疗的当代疗效
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):988-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.054. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
3
Major Limb Outcomes Following Lower Extremity Endovascular Revascularization in Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者下肢血管腔内血运重建后的主要肢体结局
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Jun;24(3):376-382. doi: 10.1177/1526602817705135. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
4
3-Year Outcomes of the OLIVE Registry, a Prospective Multicenter Study of Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Three-Year Follow-Up Study on Endovascular Treatment for Infra-Inguinal Vessel in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia.OLIVE 注册研究的 3 年结果:一项对严重肢体缺血患者的前瞻性多中心研究:严重肢体缺血患者股浅动脉腔内治疗的前瞻性、多中心、3 年随访研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;8(11):1493-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.005.
5
Comparative effectiveness of endovascular versus surgical revascularization for acute lower extremity ischemia.血管内与手术血运重建治疗急性下肢缺血的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.109. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
6
Safety and efficacy of an endovascular-first approach to acute limb ischemia.血管内优先治疗策略治疗急性肢体缺血的安全性和有效性。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1741-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Analysis of wound healing time and wound-free period as outcomes after surgical and endovascular revascularization for critical lower limb ischemia.分析手术和血管内再通治疗严重下肢缺血后伤口愈合时间和无伤口期作为结局的情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Mar;67(3):817-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.122. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
8
Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) score correlates with the intensity of multimodal limb treatment and patient-centered outcomes in patients with threatened limbs managed in a limb preservation center.血管外科学会伤口、缺血、足部感染(WIfI)评分与在肢体保全中心接受治疗的肢体威胁患者的多模式肢体治疗强度及以患者为中心的预后相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):488-498.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.063. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
9
Angiosome Targeted PTA is More Important in Endovascular Revascularisation than in Surgical Revascularisation: Analysis of 545 Patients with Ischaemic Tissue Lesions.血管体靶向经皮腔内血管成形术在血管内血运重建中比在外科血运重建中更重要:对545例缺血性组织损伤患者的分析
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;53(4):567-575. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
Impact of gender and age on outcomes of tibial artery endovascular interventions in critical limb ischemia.性别和年龄对严重肢体缺血患者胫动脉血管腔内介入治疗结局的影响
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Oct;26(7):937-45. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Jun 19.