Fleming Erin E, Ziegler Gregory R, Hayes John E
Sensory Evaluation Center, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA; Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2016 Sep 1;163:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.043. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
Salivary protein difference value (SP D-value) is a quantitative measure of salivary protein replenishment, which reportedly relates to individual differences in perceived astringency. This in vitro measure is calculated as the difference in total salivary protein before (S1) and after (S2) stimulation with tannic acid, with a greater absolute value (S2-S1) indicating less protein replenishment. Others report that this measure predicts perceived astringency and liking of liquid model systems and beverages containing added polyphenols. Whether this relationship generalizes to astringent compounds other than polyphenols, or to solid foods is unknown. Here, the associations between SP D-values and perceived astringency and overall liking/disliking for alum and tannic acid (experiment 1) as well as solid chocolate-flavored compound coating with added tannic acid or grape seed extract (GSE) (experiment 2) were examined. In both experiments, participants (n=84 and 81, respectively) indicated perceived intensity of astringency, bitterness, sweetness, and sourness, and degree of liking of either aqueous solutions, or solid chocolate-flavored compound coating with added astringents. Data were analyzed via linear regression, and as discrete groups for comparison to prior work. Three discrete groups were formed based on first and third quartile splits of the SP D-value distribution: low (LR), medium (MR), and high responding (HR) individuals. In experiment 1, significantly higher mean astringency ratings were observed for the HR as compared to the LR/MR groups for alum and tannic acid, confirming and extending prior work. In experiment 2, significantly higher mean astringency ratings were also observed for HR as compared to LR groups in solid chocolate-flavored compound containing added tannic acid or GSE. Significant differences in liking were found between HR and LR groups for alum and tannic acid in water, but no significant differences in liking were observed for chocolate-flavored compound samples. A significant linear relationship between SP D-values and perceived astringency was observed for both alum and tannic acid (p's<0.001), although the variance explained was relatively low (R(2)=0.33 and 0.29, respectively). In the solid chocolate-flavored compound spiked with either tannic acid or GSE, the relationship was not significant (p=0.17 and 0.30; R(2)=0.03 and 0.02, respectively). Due to the weak associations overall, and the lack of significant differences in perception of astringency between the MR and LR groups, we conclude that SP D-values are not a strong predictor of astringency, especially in solid, high-fat foods. Additional research investigating alternative methods for quantifying individual differences in astringency, as well as exploring the underlying complexities of this percept appears warranted.
唾液蛋白差异值(SP D值)是唾液蛋白补充的一种定量测量方法,据报道它与个体在感知涩味方面的差异有关。这种体外测量方法是通过计算用单宁酸刺激前(S1)和刺激后(S2)的总唾液蛋白差异来得出的,绝对值(S2 - S1)越大表明蛋白补充越少。其他人报告称,这种测量方法可以预测对液体模型系统和添加了多酚的饮料的涩味感知和喜好程度。这种关系是否适用于除多酚以外的涩味化合物或固体食物尚不清楚。在此,研究了SP D值与对明矾和单宁酸(实验1)以及添加了单宁酸或葡萄籽提取物(GSE)的固体巧克力味复合涂层(实验2)的涩味感知和总体喜好/厌恶之间的关联。在两个实验中,参与者(分别为n = 84和81)指出了涩味、苦味、甜味和酸味的感知强度,以及对水溶液或添加了涩味剂的固体巧克力味复合涂层的喜好程度。数据通过线性回归进行分析,并作为离散组与先前的研究进行比较。根据SP D值分布的第一和第三四分位数划分形成了三个离散组:低反应组(LR)、中等反应组(MR)和高反应组(HR)。在实验1中,与LR/MR组相比,HR组对明矾和单宁酸的平均涩味评分显著更高,证实并扩展了先前的研究。在实验2中,与LR组相比,在添加了单宁酸或GSE的固体巧克力味复合物中,HR组的平均涩味评分也显著更高。在水中,HR组和LR组对明矾和单宁酸的喜好存在显著差异,但对于巧克力味复合样品,未观察到喜好上的显著差异。对于明矾和单宁酸,均观察到SP D值与感知涩味之间存在显著的线性关系(p值<0.001),尽管解释的方差相对较低(R²分别为0.33和0.29)。在添加了单宁酸或GSE的固体巧克力味复合物中,这种关系不显著(p = 0.17和0.30;R²分别为0.03和0.02)。由于总体关联较弱,且MR组和LR组在涩味感知上缺乏显著差异,我们得出结论,SP D值不是涩味的有力预测指标,尤其是在固体高脂肪食物中。有必要进行更多研究,探索量化涩味个体差异的替代方法,以及探究这种感知的潜在复杂性。