• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

唾液蛋白水平作为模型体系和固体食物中涩味感知的预测指标。

Salivary protein levels as a predictor of perceived astringency in model systems and solid foods.

作者信息

Fleming Erin E, Ziegler Gregory R, Hayes John E

机构信息

Sensory Evaluation Center, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA; Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2016 Sep 1;163:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.043. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.043
PMID:27129672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4947416/
Abstract

Salivary protein difference value (SP D-value) is a quantitative measure of salivary protein replenishment, which reportedly relates to individual differences in perceived astringency. This in vitro measure is calculated as the difference in total salivary protein before (S1) and after (S2) stimulation with tannic acid, with a greater absolute value (S2-S1) indicating less protein replenishment. Others report that this measure predicts perceived astringency and liking of liquid model systems and beverages containing added polyphenols. Whether this relationship generalizes to astringent compounds other than polyphenols, or to solid foods is unknown. Here, the associations between SP D-values and perceived astringency and overall liking/disliking for alum and tannic acid (experiment 1) as well as solid chocolate-flavored compound coating with added tannic acid or grape seed extract (GSE) (experiment 2) were examined. In both experiments, participants (n=84 and 81, respectively) indicated perceived intensity of astringency, bitterness, sweetness, and sourness, and degree of liking of either aqueous solutions, or solid chocolate-flavored compound coating with added astringents. Data were analyzed via linear regression, and as discrete groups for comparison to prior work. Three discrete groups were formed based on first and third quartile splits of the SP D-value distribution: low (LR), medium (MR), and high responding (HR) individuals. In experiment 1, significantly higher mean astringency ratings were observed for the HR as compared to the LR/MR groups for alum and tannic acid, confirming and extending prior work. In experiment 2, significantly higher mean astringency ratings were also observed for HR as compared to LR groups in solid chocolate-flavored compound containing added tannic acid or GSE. Significant differences in liking were found between HR and LR groups for alum and tannic acid in water, but no significant differences in liking were observed for chocolate-flavored compound samples. A significant linear relationship between SP D-values and perceived astringency was observed for both alum and tannic acid (p's<0.001), although the variance explained was relatively low (R(2)=0.33 and 0.29, respectively). In the solid chocolate-flavored compound spiked with either tannic acid or GSE, the relationship was not significant (p=0.17 and 0.30; R(2)=0.03 and 0.02, respectively). Due to the weak associations overall, and the lack of significant differences in perception of astringency between the MR and LR groups, we conclude that SP D-values are not a strong predictor of astringency, especially in solid, high-fat foods. Additional research investigating alternative methods for quantifying individual differences in astringency, as well as exploring the underlying complexities of this percept appears warranted.

摘要

唾液蛋白差异值(SP D值)是唾液蛋白补充的一种定量测量方法,据报道它与个体在感知涩味方面的差异有关。这种体外测量方法是通过计算用单宁酸刺激前(S1)和刺激后(S2)的总唾液蛋白差异来得出的,绝对值(S2 - S1)越大表明蛋白补充越少。其他人报告称,这种测量方法可以预测对液体模型系统和添加了多酚的饮料的涩味感知和喜好程度。这种关系是否适用于除多酚以外的涩味化合物或固体食物尚不清楚。在此,研究了SP D值与对明矾和单宁酸(实验1)以及添加了单宁酸或葡萄籽提取物(GSE)的固体巧克力味复合涂层(实验2)的涩味感知和总体喜好/厌恶之间的关联。在两个实验中,参与者(分别为n = 84和81)指出了涩味、苦味、甜味和酸味的感知强度,以及对水溶液或添加了涩味剂的固体巧克力味复合涂层的喜好程度。数据通过线性回归进行分析,并作为离散组与先前的研究进行比较。根据SP D值分布的第一和第三四分位数划分形成了三个离散组:低反应组(LR)、中等反应组(MR)和高反应组(HR)。在实验1中,与LR/MR组相比,HR组对明矾和单宁酸的平均涩味评分显著更高,证实并扩展了先前的研究。在实验2中,与LR组相比,在添加了单宁酸或GSE的固体巧克力味复合物中,HR组的平均涩味评分也显著更高。在水中,HR组和LR组对明矾和单宁酸的喜好存在显著差异,但对于巧克力味复合样品,未观察到喜好上的显著差异。对于明矾和单宁酸,均观察到SP D值与感知涩味之间存在显著的线性关系(p值<0.001),尽管解释的方差相对较低(R²分别为0.33和0.29)。在添加了单宁酸或GSE的固体巧克力味复合物中,这种关系不显著(p = 0.17和0.30;R²分别为0.03和0.02)。由于总体关联较弱,且MR组和LR组在涩味感知上缺乏显著差异,我们得出结论,SP D值不是涩味的有力预测指标,尤其是在固体高脂肪食物中。有必要进行更多研究,探索量化涩味个体差异的替代方法,以及探究这种感知的潜在复杂性。

相似文献

1
Salivary protein levels as a predictor of perceived astringency in model systems and solid foods.唾液蛋白水平作为模型体系和固体食物中涩味感知的预测指标。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Sep 1;163:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.043. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
2
Sensory perception of and salivary protein response to astringency as a function of the 6-n-propylthioural (PROP) bitter-taste phenotype.作为6-正丙基硫氧嘧啶(PROP)苦味表型的函数,对涩味的感官感知和唾液蛋白反应。
Physiol Behav. 2017 May 1;173:163-173. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
Temporary modification of salivary protein profile and individual responses to repeated phenolic astringent stimuli.唾液蛋白谱的临时改变与对重复酚类收敛刺激的个体反应。
Chem Senses. 2010 Jan;35(1):75-85. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjp084. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
4
Individual astringency responsiveness affects the acceptance of phenol-rich foods.个体涩味感受性影响富含酚类食物的接受度。
Appetite. 2011 Jun;56(3):633-42. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.017. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
5
Investigating Mixture Interactions of Astringent Stimuli Using the Isobole Approach.使用等效线法研究收敛性刺激的混合相互作用。
Chem Senses. 2016 Sep;41(7):601-10. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw064. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
6
A physiological model of tea-induced astringency.茶致涩味的生理模型。
Physiol Behav. 2008 Oct 20;95(3):290-4. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
7
Quantification of Oral Roughness Perception and Comparison with Mechanism of Astringency Perception.口腔粗糙度感知的量化及其与涩味感知机制的比较。
Chem Senses. 2017 Sep 1;42(7):525-535. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjx029.
8
Saliva characteristics and individual sensitivity to phenolic astringent stimuli.唾液特征与个体对酚类收敛性刺激的敏感性。
Chem Senses. 2009 May;34(4):295-304. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjp003. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
9
The role of TRPA1 and TRPV1 in the perception of astringency.辣椒素受体 TRPA1 和 TRPV1 在涩味感知中的作用。
Chem Senses. 2024 Jan 1;49. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjae031.
10
Astringency Sensitivity to Tannic Acid: Effect of Ageing and Saliva.对单宁酸的涩味敏感度:老化和唾液的影响。
Molecules. 2022 Feb 28;27(5):1617. doi: 10.3390/molecules27051617.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring cheese and red wine pairing by an simulation of tasting.通过味觉模拟探索奶酪与红酒的搭配。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2024 Jun 17;9:100792. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100792. eCollection 2024.
2
What Is ? Investigating Consumer Language and Perception of Fine Particles in Beverages Containing Pea and Potato Starch.什么是?探究消费者对含有豌豆和马铃薯淀粉的饮料中细颗粒的语言表达和认知。
Foods. 2024 Jun 13;13(12):1852. doi: 10.3390/foods13121852.
3
Salivary flow and turbidity development inconsistently associated with lower taste intensity of vegetables and juices.

本文引用的文献

1
Check-All-That-Apply (CATA), Sorting, and Polarized Sensory Positioning (PSP) with Astringent Stimuli.使用收敛性刺激进行多项选择(CATA)、分类和极化感官定位(PSP)。
Food Qual Prefer. 2015 Oct 1;45:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.004.
2
Astringency is a trigeminal sensation that involves the activation of G protein-coupled signaling by phenolic compounds.涩味是一种三叉神经感觉,涉及酚类化合物对G蛋白偶联信号的激活。
Chem Senses. 2014 Jul;39(6):471-87. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bju014. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
3
Rebaudioside A and Rebaudioside D bitterness do not covary with Acesulfame K bitterness or polymorphisms in and .
唾液分泌量和浑浊度的变化与蔬菜和果汁较低的味觉强度之间的关联并不一致。
Food Qual Prefer. 2023 Feb;106. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104807. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
4
Repeated exposure to epigallocatechin gallate solution or water alters bitterness intensity and salivary protein profile.重复接触表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯溶液或水会改变苦味强度和唾液蛋白谱。
Physiol Behav. 2021 Dec 1;242:113624. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113624. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
5
Influence of Age and Individual Differences on Mouthfeel Perception of Whey Protein-Fortified Products: A Review.年龄和个体差异对乳清蛋白强化产品口感感知的影响:综述
Foods. 2021 Feb 16;10(2):433. doi: 10.3390/foods10020433.
6
Sensorial Perception of Astringency: Oral Mechanisms and Current Analysis Methods.涩味的感官感知:口腔机制与当前分析方法
Foods. 2020 Aug 14;9(8):1124. doi: 10.3390/foods9081124.
7
Addition of chocolate milk to diet corresponds to protein concentration changes in human saliva.饮食中添加巧克力牛奶会导致人体唾液中的蛋白质浓度发生变化。
Physiol Behav. 2020 Oct 15;225:113080. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113080. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
Discrimination of Isointense Bitter Stimuli in a Beer Model System.同强度苦味刺激在啤酒模型体系中的区分。
Nutrients. 2020 May 27;12(6):1560. doi: 10.3390/nu12061560.
9
Influence of biological, experiential and psychological factors in wine preference segmentation.生物、体验和心理因素对葡萄酒偏好细分的影响。
Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2017 Jun;23(2):154-161. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12266. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
Investigating Mixture Interactions of Astringent Stimuli Using the Isobole Approach.使用等效线法研究收敛性刺激的混合相互作用。
Chem Senses. 2016 Sep;41(7):601-10. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw064. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
莱鲍迪苷A和莱鲍迪苷D的苦味与乙酰磺胺酸钾的苦味或[具体基因名称1]和[具体基因名称2]中的多态性不存在共变关系。
Chemosens Percept. 2013 Sep 1;6(3). doi: 10.1007/s12078-013-9149-9.
4
Do polymorphisms in chemosensory genes matter for human ingestive behavior?化学感应基因的多态性对人类摄食行为有影响吗?
Food Qual Prefer. 2013 Dec;30(2):202-216. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.05.013.
5
Tolerance for high flavanol cocoa powder in semisweet chocolate.对半甜巧克力中高黄烷醇可可粉的耐受性。
Nutrients. 2013 Jun 21;5(6):2258-67. doi: 10.3390/nu5062258.
6
Personality factors predict spicy food liking and intake.人格因素可预测对辛辣食物的喜好和摄入量。
Food Qual Prefer. 2013 Apr 1;28(1):213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
7
Direct comparison of the generalized Visual Analog Scale (gVAS) and general Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS).广义视觉模拟量表(gVAS)与广义标记量值量表(gLMS)的直接比较。
Food Qual Prefer. 2013 Apr 1;28(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
8
Astringency of foods may not be directly related to salivary lubricity.食物的涩味可能与唾液的润滑度没有直接关系。
J Food Sci. 2012 Sep;77(9):S302-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02860.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
9
The role of salivary proteins in the mechanism of astringency.唾液蛋白在涩味机制中的作用。
J Food Sci. 2012 Apr;77(4):C381-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02644.x.
10
Two decades of supertasting: where do we stand?超味觉体验二十年:我们处于何种地位?
Physiol Behav. 2011 Oct 24;104(5):1072-4. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Aug 7.