Freye Chris E, Fitz Brian D, Billingsley Matthew C, Synovec Robert E
Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Air Force Research Laboratory/RQRC, 10 E Saturn Blvd., Edwards AFB, CA 93524, USA.
Talanta. 2016 Jun 1;153:203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
The chemical composition and several physical properties of RP-1 fuels were studied using comprehensive two-dimensional (2D) gas chromatography (GC×GC) coupled with flame ionization detection (FID). A "reversed column" GC×GC configuration was implemented with a RTX-wax column on the first dimension ((1)D), and a RTX-1 as the second dimension ((2)D). Modulation was achieved using a high temperature diaphragm valve mounted directly in the oven. Using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV), the summed GC×GC-FID signal of three compound-class selective 2D regions (alkanes, cycloalkanes, and aromatics) was regressed against previously measured ASTM derived values for these compound classes, yielding root mean square errors of cross validation (RMSECV) of 0.855, 0.734, and 0.530mass%, respectively. For comparison, using partial least squares (PLS) analysis with LOOCV, the GC×GC-FID signal of the entire 2D separations was regressed against the same ASTM values, yielding a linear trend for the three compound classes (alkanes, cycloalkanes, and aromatics), yielding RMSECV values of 1.52, 2.76, and 0.945 mass%, respectively. Additionally, a more detailed PLS analysis was undertaken of the compounds classes (n-alkanes, iso-alkanes, mono-, di-, and tri-cycloalkanes, and aromatics), and of physical properties previously determined by ASTM methods (such as net heat of combustion, hydrogen content, density, kinematic viscosity, sustained boiling temperature and vapor rise temperature). Results from these PLS studies using the relatively simple to use and inexpensive GC×GC-FID instrumental platform are compared to previously reported results using the GC×GC-TOFMS instrumental platform.
采用全二维(2D)气相色谱(GC×GC)与火焰离子化检测(FID)联用技术,对RP - 1燃料的化学成分和若干物理性质进行了研究。采用“反相柱”GC×GC配置,第一维((1)D)使用RTX - wax柱,第二维((2)D)使用RTX - 1柱。调制通过直接安装在柱箱中的高温隔膜阀实现。使用留一法交叉验证(LOOCV),将三个化合物类别选择性二维区域(烷烃、环烷烃和芳烃)的GC×GC - FID信号总和与这些化合物类别的先前测量的ASTM衍生值进行回归分析,得到交叉验证均方根误差(RMSECV)分别为0.855、0.734和0.530质量%。为作比较,使用带LOOCV的偏最小二乘法(PLS)分析,将整个二维分离的GC×GC - FID信号与相同的ASTM值进行回归分析,得到三个化合物类别(烷烃、环烷烃和芳烃)的线性趋势,RMSECV值分别为1.52、2.76和0.945质量%。此外,还对化合物类别(正构烷烃、异构烷烃、单环、二环和三环环烷烃以及芳烃)以及先前通过ASTM方法测定的物理性质(如燃烧净热、氢含量、密度、运动粘度、持续沸点温度和蒸汽上升温度)进行了更详细的PLS分析。将这些使用相对简单且廉价的GC×GC - FID仪器平台的PLS研究结果与先前报道的使用GC×GC - TOFMS仪器平台的结果进行了比较。