Blackledge G, Lawton F, Redman C, Kelly K
West Midlands Cancer Research Campaign Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, UK.
Br J Cancer. 1989 Apr;59(4):650-3. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.132.
Results using the same drug in phase II studies of treatment in ovarian cancer vary widely. An analysis of five phase II studies with a total of 93 patients was carried out to determine whether factors other than the efficacy of the drug affect response. The drugs for the phase II studies were chosen on the basis of in vitro activity or previous activity in humans. Univariate analysis showed that several factors were of significance in predicting response. The most significant was interval from the end of previous treatment to entry into a phase II study. Others were the original presenting stage of the patient, the second line treatment given and the best previous response to therapy. In multivariate analysis, however, only two factors were shown to be of importance which were interval and the FIGO stage of the patient. Using these two variables the discriminant analysis predicted 89% of those who did not respond and 75% of those who did, with an overall correct prediction of 85%. The importance of interval is emphasised by the observation that the response rate for those patients who progressed on treatment or who relapsed within 3-6 months of primary therapy had a response rate of less than 10%. Future phase II studies should probably exclude patients in this category, since the chance of their responding is very low.
在卵巢癌治疗的II期研究中,使用相同药物的结果差异很大。对五项II期研究(共93名患者)进行了分析,以确定除药物疗效外的其他因素是否影响反应。II期研究的药物是根据体外活性或先前在人体中的活性选择的。单因素分析表明,几个因素在预测反应方面具有重要意义。最显著的是从上一次治疗结束到进入II期研究的间隔时间。其他因素包括患者最初的呈现阶段、给予的二线治疗以及先前对治疗的最佳反应。然而,在多因素分析中,只有两个因素被证明是重要的,即间隔时间和患者的国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期。使用这两个变量,判别分析预测出89%无反应者和75%有反应者,总体正确预测率为85%。间隔时间的重要性通过以下观察得到强调:那些在治疗中进展或在初始治疗后3至6个月内复发的患者,其反应率低于10%。未来的II期研究可能应排除这一类患者,因为他们有反应的机会非常低。