Berg Jody-Lynn, Swan Natasha M, Banks Sarah J, Miller Justin B
a Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health , Las Vegas , NV , USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;38(7):745-51. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1161734. Epub 2016 May 1.
Cognitive set shifting requires flexible application of lower level processes. The Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System (DKEFS) Color-Word Interference Test (CWIT) is commonly used to clinically assess cognitive set shifting. An atypical pattern of performance has been observed on the CWIT; a subset of individuals perform faster, with equal or fewer errors, on the more difficult inhibition/switching than the inhibition trial. This study seeks to explore the cognitive underpinnings of this atypical pattern. It is hypothesized that atypical patterns on CWIT will be associated with better performance on underlying cognitive measures of attention, working memory, and learning when compared to typical CWIT patterns.
Records from 239 clinical referrals (age: M = 68.09 years, SD = 10.62; education: M = 14.87 years, SD = 2.73) seen for a neuropsychological evaluation as part of diagnostic work up in an outpatient dementia and movement disorders clinic were sampled. The standard battery of tests included measures of attention, learning, fluency, executive functioning, and working memory. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted to compare the cognitive performance of those with typical versus atypical CWIT patterns.
An atypical pattern of performance was confirmed in 23% of our sample. Analyses revealed a significant group difference in acquisition of information on both nonverbal (Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, BVMT-R total recall), F(1, 213) = 16.61, p < .001, and verbal (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, HVLT-R total recall) learning tasks, F(1, 181) = 6.43, p < .01, and semantic fluency (Animal Naming), F(1, 232) = 7.57, p = .006, with the atypical group performing better on each task. Effect sizes were larger for nonverbal (Cohen's d = 0.66) than verbal learning (Cohen's d = 0.47) and semantic fluency (Cohen's d = 0.43).
Individuals demonstrating an atypical pattern of performance on the CWIT inhibition/switching trial also demonstrated relative strengths in semantic fluency and learning.
认知定势转换需要灵活运用较低层次的加工过程。德利斯科-卡普兰执行功能系统(DKEFS)颜色-词语干扰测试(CWIT)常用于临床评估认知定势转换。在CWIT测试中观察到一种非典型的表现模式;一部分个体在更困难的抑制/转换任务上比抑制任务执行得更快,错误数量相同或更少。本研究旨在探讨这种非典型模式的认知基础。研究假设,与典型的CWIT模式相比,CWIT测试中的非典型模式将与注意力、工作记忆和学习等潜在认知测量指标上的更好表现相关。
抽取了239例临床转诊患者(年龄:M = 68.09岁,标准差 = 10.62;受教育程度:M = 14.87年,标准差 = 2.73)的记录,这些患者在一家门诊痴呆与运动障碍诊所进行神经心理学评估,作为诊断检查的一部分。标准测试组合包括注意力、学习、流畅性、执行功能和工作记忆的测量指标。进行方差分析(ANOVA)以比较具有典型与非典型CWIT模式的患者的认知表现。
在我们的样本中,23%的患者表现出非典型模式。分析显示,在非言语(简短视觉空间记忆测试修订版,BVMT-R总回忆)、F(1, 213) = 16.61,p <.001和言语(霍普金斯言语学习测试修订版,HVLT-R总回忆)学习任务以及语义流畅性(动物命名)、F(1, 232) = 7.57,p =.006方面,两组在信息获取上存在显著差异,非典型组在每项任务上表现更好。非言语学习(科恩d = 0.66)的效应量大于言语学习(科恩d = 0.47)和语义流畅性(科恩d = 0.43)。
在CWIT抑制/转换任务中表现出非典型模式的个体在语义流畅性和学习方面也表现出相对优势。