Belk Mark C, Schaalje G Bruce
Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.
Department of Statistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.
Dev Genes Evol. 2016 Jun;226(3):197-207. doi: 10.1007/s00427-016-0547-2. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
Molecular genetic data suggest that June sucker (Chasmistes liorus) is only shallowly diverged from the co-occurring but phenotypically distinct Utah sucker (Catostomus ardens) in Utah Lake. Phenotypes representing both extreme morphologies (June sucker and Utah sucker) are observed in the small wild population, but relatively large numbers of intermediate phenotypes are also present. This relatively continuous variation between the two putative species could result from extensive hybridization (including reticulate evolutionary patterns) of genetically based phenotypes or incomplete divergence among lineages and extensive phenotypic plasticity with little genetic basis. To help inform the evolutionary history of June sucker and to provide critical information for management and restoration of June sucker populations, we evaluated the distribution of shape phenotypes among purebreds of each species and their hybrids and determined the heritability of shape and ecological performance between June sucker (C. liorus) and its sister species Utah sucker (C. ardens). Mouth shape of purebred June sucker and Utah sucker are located at the extremes, and hybrids are located midway between the purebreds. Multivariate heritability was relatively high for mouth shape at 0.27. Heritability for growth rate was high at 0.32-0.42, but variation was not associated with cross type. Genetically based variation in mouth shape has evolved fairly rapidly or has been maintained in the face of ongoing hybridization between the two species. Currently, there seems to be little evidence for differential selection between species that would maintain shape variation.
分子遗传学数据表明,六月吸口鱼(Chasmistes liorus)与犹他湖中共存但表型不同的犹他吸口鱼(Catostomus ardens)的分化程度较低。在小型野生种群中观察到了代表两种极端形态(六月吸口鱼和犹他吸口鱼)的表型,但也存在相对大量的中间表型。这两个假定物种之间相对连续的变异可能是由于基于遗传的表型的广泛杂交(包括网状进化模式)、谱系间不完全分化以及几乎没有遗传基础的广泛表型可塑性。为了深入了解六月吸口鱼的进化历史,并为六月吸口鱼种群的管理和恢复提供关键信息,我们评估了每个物种及其杂种的纯种中形状表型的分布,并确定了六月吸口鱼(C. liorus)与其姐妹物种犹他吸口鱼(C. ardens)之间形状和生态性能的遗传力。纯种六月吸口鱼和犹他吸口鱼的口型处于极端位置,杂种则位于纯种之间的中间位置。口型的多变量遗传力相对较高,为0.27。生长速率的遗传力较高,为0.32 - 0.42,但变异与杂交类型无关。基于遗传的口型变异进化得相当快,或者在两个物种持续杂交的情况下得以维持。目前,似乎几乎没有证据表明物种之间存在差异选择来维持形状变异。