a Graduate Program for Neuroscience - Computational Neuroscience , Boston University , MA , USA ;
b Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences , Boston University , Boston , MA , USA ;
Augment Altern Commun. 2016 Jun;32(2):120-30. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2016.1170205. Epub 2016 May 4.
Many individuals with minimal movement capabilities use AAC to communicate. These individuals require both an interface with which to construct a message (e.g., a grid of letters) and an input modality with which to select targets. This study evaluated the interaction of two such systems: (a) an input modality using surface electromyography (sEMG) of spared facial musculature, and (b) an onscreen interface from which users select phonemic targets. These systems were evaluated in two experiments: (a) participants without motor impairments used the systems during a series of eight training sessions, and (b) one individual who uses AAC used the systems for two sessions. Both the phonemic interface and the electromyographic cursor show promise for future AAC applications.
许多运动能力有限的人使用 AAC 进行交流。这些人需要一个界面来构建消息(例如,字母网格),以及一种输入模式来选择目标。本研究评估了两种此类系统的交互作用:(a) 使用面部肌肉的表面肌电图 (sEMG) 的输入模式,以及 (b) 用于选择音素目标的屏幕界面。这些系统在两项实验中进行了评估:(a) 没有运动障碍的参与者在一系列八次培训课程中使用了这些系统,以及 (b) 一名使用 AAC 的参与者在两次会议中使用了这些系统。音素界面和肌电图光标都为未来的 AAC 应用展示了前景。