Suppr超能文献

超声造影检查中均匀强化的乳腺病变:根据传统超声和超声造影检查结果进行鉴别诊断

Homogeneously enhancing breast lesions on contrast enhanced US: differential diagnosis by conventional and contrast enhanced US findings.

作者信息

Fujimitsu Ritsuko, Shimakura Mikiko, Urakawa Hiroshi, Morita Ayako, Shinagawa Yoshinobu, Sakamoto Keiko, Yoshimitsu Kengo

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2016 Jul;34(7):508-14. doi: 10.1007/s11604-016-0549-z. Epub 2016 May 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the details of homogeneously enhancing lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and also to elucidate whether their differential diagnosis is possible.

METHODS

Seventy-three homogeneously enhancing lesions on CEUS were retrospectively selected. Two radiologists first assessed conventional US findings alone in consensus to differentiate malignant vs. benign lesions. Then, qualitative and quantitative CEUS findings were analyzed to determine the useful findings for the differential diagnosis. Determined CEUS findings were applied to the indeterminate lesions based on conventional US findings to see whether CEUS can improve the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

There were 42 cancers (58 %) out of 73. Sensitivity and specificity using conventional US findings alone were 91 and 55 %, respectively. Among the CEUS findings tested, multivariate analysis revealed only the type 3 enhancement pattern, which indicates a larger enhancing area than the precontrast hypoechoic lesion, was related to malignancy (p < 0.05). By adding this information, however, no improvement was achieved in the diagnostic performance as determined by conventional US findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of the homogeneously enhancing lesions on CEUS are malignant, and differentiation of malignant from benign lesions may be possible, at least to some extent, by meticulous assessment of the conventional US rather than CEUS findings.

摘要

目的

明确超声造影(CEUS)上均匀强化病灶的细节,并阐明是否能够对其进行鉴别诊断。

方法

回顾性选取73个CEUS上均匀强化的病灶。两名放射科医生首先仅通过共识评估传统超声检查结果,以鉴别恶性与良性病灶。然后,分析CEUS的定性和定量检查结果,以确定对鉴别诊断有用的检查结果。将确定的CEUS检查结果应用于基于传统超声检查结果的不确定病灶,以观察CEUS是否能提高诊断性能。

结果

73个病灶中有42个为癌症(58%)。仅使用传统超声检查结果时,敏感性和特异性分别为91%和55%。在测试的CEUS检查结果中,多变量分析显示只有3型强化模式(即强化面积大于造影前低回声病灶)与恶性肿瘤相关(p<0.05)。然而,通过添加此信息,传统超声检查结果所确定的诊断性能并未得到改善。

结论

CEUS上约一半的均匀强化病灶为恶性,通过仔细评估传统超声检查结果而非CEUS检查结果,至少在一定程度上可能实现恶性与良性病灶的鉴别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验