Kim Taeyeon, Chang Ji-Young, Myung Sun Jung, Chang Yerim, Park Kyung Duk, Park Wan Beom, Shin Chan Soo
Office of Medical Education, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Office of Medical Education, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Surg Educ. 2016 Jul-Aug;73(4):715-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
Though many medical schools applied various admission criteria in the selection process, the evidence of using those criteria is unclear. This study examined the predictive validity of each admission criterion for student competency.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of all students who matriculated to Seoul National University School of Medicine from 2002 to 2008. Demographic characteristics, admission criteria scores, and clinical competencies based on grade point average (GPA), objective structured clinical examination score, and internship score were obtained for each student to analyze the predictive validity of admission criteria.
Graduate GPA at the end of 4 years positively correlated with preadmission GPA (p < 0.0001) and written test score (p = 0.012) but negatively correlated with essay test (p = 0.049). Internship score significantly correlated with preadmission GPA and graduate GPA. Regression analysis revealed that the preadmission GPA of the affiliated college and young age at admission could predict GPA, and preadmission GPA and graduate GPA could predict the internship score, which indicates postgraduate clinical performance.
These findings suggest that preadmission GPA is a reliable predictor of academic achievement during medical school and postgraduate clinical performance. For assessing nonacademic competencies, further research is needed.
尽管许多医学院在选拔过程中采用了各种录取标准,但使用这些标准的证据并不明确。本研究考察了每项录取标准对学生能力的预测效度。
设计、背景和参与者:我们对2002年至2008年进入首尔国立大学医学院的所有学生进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。获取了每名学生的人口统计学特征、录取标准分数以及基于平均绩点(GPA)、客观结构化临床考试分数和实习分数的临床能力,以分析录取标准的预测效度。
4年末的研究生GPA与入学前GPA呈正相关(p < 0.0001),与笔试成绩呈正相关(p = 0.012),但与论文考试成绩呈负相关(p = 0.049)。实习分数与入学前GPA和研究生GPA显著相关。回归分析显示,附属学院的入学前GPA和入学时年龄较小可预测GPA,入学前GPA和研究生GPA可预测实习分数,这表明了研究生阶段的临床表现。
这些发现表明,入学前GPA是医学院学业成绩和研究生临床表的可靠预测指标。对于评估非学术能力,还需要进一步研究。