网络荟萃分析以综合心血管研究中决策的证据。

Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research.

作者信息

Roever Leonardo, Biondi-Zoccai Giuseppe

机构信息

Departmento de Pesquisa Clínica, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.

Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2016 Apr;106(4):333-7. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160052.

Abstract

Clinical decision-making requires synthesis of evidence from literature reviews focused on a specific theme. Evidence synthesis is performed with qualitative assessments and systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, typically covering statistical pooling with pairwise meta-analyses. These methods include adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and mixed-treatment comparison. These tools allow synthesis of evidence and comparison of effectiveness in cardiovascular research.

摘要

临床决策需要综合来自聚焦于特定主题的文献综述的证据。证据综合通过定性评估和对随机临床试验的系统评价来进行,通常涵盖采用成对荟萃分析的统计合并。这些方法包括调整间接比较荟萃分析、网状荟萃分析和混合治疗比较。这些工具可用于心血管研究中的证据综合和疗效比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b301/4845707/a4a3543b0474/abc-106-04-0333-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索