CHU de Nancy, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France; CHU de Nancy, Service de Réanimation Médicale Brabois, Nancy, France.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Jul;22(7):625-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.04.019. Epub 2016 May 1.
Our objective was to assess current practices about the administration (intermittent, extended, or continuous infusions) and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of β-lactam antibiotics and vancomycin in France. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey in May-August 2015, using an online questionnaire, sent as an e-mail link to infectious disease specialists and intensive care specialists through national mailing lists. We used clinical vignettes of critically ill patients to assess physicians' practices about administration and TDM practices for amoxicillin, cloxacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem and vancomycin. In all, 507 physicians participated (507/1200, response rate 42%). TDM was rarely available for β-lactams (from 16.5% (81/490) for cloxacillin to 30% (145/490) for ceftazidime), whereas vancomycin TDM was available in 97% (477/490) of the cases. In the clinical vignettes, ceftazidime and piperacillin/tazobactam were the β-lactams administered most frequently by extended or continuous infusions (76% (336/440) and 57% (252/444), respectively). Gaps in knowledge about the duration of stability of intravenous β-lactams were common (correct answers ranged from 8% (35/432) for cloxacillin to 33% (146/438) for ceftazidime). Most physicians (77%, 339/442) were convinced of the value of extended or continuous infusions for β-lactams in critically ill patients, but 48% (211/442) did not have access to practical guidelines. Our survey found that most infectious disease and intensive care specialists are favourable to optimized administration of β-lactams in critically ill patients. But the lack of guidelines and limited TDM availability for β-lactams in hospitals are potential barriers to its implementation.
我们的目的是评估法国目前β-内酰胺类抗生素和万古霉素的给药(间歇性、延长或连续输注)和治疗药物监测(TDM)实践。我们于 2015 年 5 月至 8 月进行了一项全国性的横断面调查,使用在线问卷,通过国家邮件列表向传染病专家和重症监护专家发送电子邮件链接。我们使用危重病患者的临床案例来评估医生在阿莫西林、氯唑西林、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、头孢噻肟、头孢他啶、头孢吡肟、美罗培南和万古霉素的给药和 TDM 实践。共有 507 名医生参与(507/1200,应答率 42%)。β-内酰胺类药物的 TDM 很少可用(从氯唑西林的 16.5%(81/490)到头孢他啶的 30%(145/490)),而万古霉素 TDM 在 97%(477/490)的情况下都可用。在临床案例中,头孢他啶和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦最常通过延长或连续输注给药(分别为 76%(336/440)和 57%(252/444))。关于静脉内β-内酰胺类药物稳定性持续时间的知识差距很常见(正确答案范围从氯唑西林的 8%(35/432)到头孢他啶的 33%(146/438))。大多数医生(77%,339/442)相信在危重病患者中延长或连续输注β-内酰胺类药物的价值,但 48%(211/442)无法获得实用指南。我们的调查发现,大多数传染病和重症监护专家都支持在危重病患者中优化β-内酰胺类药物的给药。但是,缺乏指南和医院内β-内酰胺类药物 TDM 的有限可用性是实施的潜在障碍。