Barbero Sergio, Portilla Javier
Instituto de Óptica (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016 Jul;36(4):421-7. doi: 10.1111/opo.12301. Epub 2016 May 4.
Non-uniform magnification (distortion) and dioptric blur are two major undesired optical defects affecting vision when looking through progressive addition lenses (PALs) and studying them is potentially very valuable for PAL design. The major purpose of this paper is to analyse the relationship between dioptric power and magnification and, additionally, to evaluate the expected values of distortion and dioptric blur typically present in PALs. This has not been carefully and rigorously analysed to date.
We computed the local dioptric and magnification matrices (using a two-ray differential method) for different gaze directions in an archetypical model of a PAL. We used four different maps: scalar magnification and anamorphic distortion, to describe magnification, and mean power and astigmatism, to describe dioptric power.
There is a good correlation between scalar magnification and mean power on the one hand, and anamorphic distortion and astigmatism on the other hand. Changes of 1 D in mean power are associated with variations in scalar magnification of around 3%. Also, 3% of anamorphic distortion is associated with increasing astigmatism up to 1 D. The directions of maximal power and maximal magnification are quite similar, though not equal (differences up to ± 1.5°). These directions strongly change from close to isotropic at the intermediate corridor to around 45° of oblique inclination for a few degrees of horizontal eye rotation. In typical PALs the level of distortion, which is unavoidably present when dioptric blurring appears, is small for usable vision zones (below 1 D of astigmatism).
The combined analysis of dioptric power and magnification in PALs helps to understand their limitations as a visual aid. On the one hand, the potentials of including distortion magnitude as a target in the metric function being optimised in the PAL design are reduced; on the other hand, it seems worthwhile to explore adding the degradation orientation as an additional target.
非均匀放大率(畸变)和屈光性模糊是影响通过渐进多焦点镜片(PAL)视物时视力的两个主要不良光学缺陷,对其进行研究对于PAL设计可能具有非常重要的价值。本文的主要目的是分析屈光力与放大率之间的关系,并进一步评估PAL中通常存在的畸变和屈光性模糊的预期值。迄今为止,尚未对此进行过仔细且严格的分析。
我们在一个典型的PAL模型中,针对不同的注视方向计算了局部屈光和放大率矩阵(使用双光线微分法)。我们使用了四种不同的映射:标量放大率和变形畸变,用于描述放大率;平均屈光力和散光,用于描述屈光力。
一方面,标量放大率与平均屈光力之间存在良好的相关性,另一方面,变形畸变与散光之间也存在良好的相关性。平均屈光力变化1 D与标量放大率变化约3%相关。此外,3%的变形畸变与散光增加至1 D相关。最大屈光力方向和最大放大率方向相当相似,尽管并不完全相同(差异高达±1.5°)。这些方向从中间走廊处接近各向同性,随着水平眼旋转几度,强烈变化为约45°的倾斜度。在典型的PAL中,对于可用视区(散光低于1 D),当出现屈光性模糊时不可避免地存在的畸变水平较小。
对PAL中的屈光力和放大率进行综合分析有助于理解其作为视觉辅助工具的局限性。一方面,在PAL设计中作为优化的度量函数目标纳入畸变幅度的潜力降低;另一方面,探索将退化方向作为额外目标似乎是值得的。