Trapero Carlos, Wilson Iain W, Stiller Warwick N, Wilson Lewis J
CSIRO Agriculture, Narrabri, NSW Australia.
CSIRO Agriculture, Canberra, ACT Australia.
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Apr 22;7:500. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00500. eCollection 2016.
Cotton has lost many ancestral defensive traits against key invertebrate pests. This is suggested by the levels of resistance to some pests found in wild cotton genotypes as well as in cultivated landraces and is a result of domestication and a long history of targeted breeding for yield and fiber quality, along with the capacity to control pests with pesticides. Genetic modification (GM) allowed integration of toxins from a bacteria into cotton to control key Lepidopteran pests. Since the mid-1990s, use of GM cotton cultivars has greatly reduced the amount of pesticides used in many cotton systems. However, pests not controlled by the GM traits have usually emerged as problems, especially the sucking bug complex. Control of this complex with pesticides often causes a reduction in beneficial invertebrate populations, allowing other secondary pests to increase rapidly and require control. Control of both sucking bug complex and secondary pests is problematic due to the cost of pesticides and/or high risk of selecting for pesticide resistance. Deployment of host plant resistance (HPR) provides an opportunity to manage these issues in GM cotton systems. Cotton cultivars resistant to the sucking bug complex and/or secondary pests would require fewer pesticide applications, reducing costs and risks to beneficial invertebrate populations and pesticide resistance. Incorporation of HPR traits into elite cotton cultivars with high yield and fiber quality offers the potential to further reduce pesticide use and increase the durability of pest management in GM cotton systems. We review the challenges that the identification and use of HPR against invertebrate pests brings to cotton breeding. We explore sources of resistance to the sucking bug complex and secondary pests, the mechanisms that control them and the approaches to incorporate these defense traits to commercial cultivars.
棉花已经失去了许多针对主要无脊椎害虫的祖先防御特性。野生棉花基因型以及栽培地方品种中对某些害虫的抗性水平表明了这一点,这是驯化以及长期有针对性地培育产量和纤维品质,以及使用杀虫剂控制害虫的结果。基因改造(GM)使棉花能够整合来自细菌的毒素,以控制主要的鳞翅目害虫。自20世纪90年代中期以来,转基因棉花品种的使用大大减少了许多棉花种植系统中农药的使用量。然而,不受转基因特性控制的害虫通常会成为问题,尤其是吸食性害虫复合体。用杀虫剂控制这种复合体通常会导致有益无脊椎动物种群数量减少,使其他次要害虫迅速增加并需要加以控制。由于农药成本和/或产生抗药性的高风险,控制吸食性害虫复合体和次要害虫都存在问题。部署寄主植物抗性(HPR)为在转基因棉花系统中管理这些问题提供了一个机会。对吸食性害虫复合体和/或次要害虫具有抗性的棉花品种需要较少的农药施用,从而降低成本以及对有益无脊椎动物种群和抗药性的风险。将寄主植物抗性特性纳入具有高产和优质纤维的优良棉花品种中,有可能进一步减少农药使用,并提高转基因棉花系统中害虫管理的持久性。我们综述了鉴定和利用寄主植物抗性对抗无脊椎害虫给棉花育种带来的挑战。我们探索了对吸食性害虫复合体和次要害虫的抗性来源、控制它们的机制以及将这些防御特性整合到商业品种中的方法。