J Occup Health Psychol. 2016 Jul;21(3):283. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000032. Epub 2016 May 9.
Reports an error in "Job crafting in changing organizations: Antecedents and implications for exhaustion and performance" by Paraskevas Petrou, Evangelia Demerouti and Wilmar B. Schaufeli (Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2015[Oct], Vol 20[4], 470-480). In the article, there were misreported variables in one of the figures. The legend for Figure 1 should read "Tested SEM model. χ² = 76.50, df = 30, p .000, CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.92, GFI = .98, RMSEA = .05, RMR = .05; significant synchronous correlations are displayed without their coefficients for clarity purposes. *p ≤ .05.**p ≤ .01." (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2015-12642-001.) The present study addressed employee job crafting behaviors (i.e., seeking resources, seeking challenges, and reducing demands) in the context of organizational change. We examined predictors of job crafting both at the organizational level (i.e., perceived impact of the implemented changes on the working life of employees) and the individual level (i.e., employee willingness to follow the changes). Job crafting behaviors were expected to predict task performance and exhaustion. Two-wave longitudinal data from 580 police officers undergoing organizational changes were analyzed with structural equation modeling. Findings showed that the degree to which changes influence employees' daily work was linked to reducing demands and exhaustion, whereas employee willingness to change was linked to seeking resources and seeking challenges. Furthermore, while seeking resources and seeking challenges were associated with high task performance and low exhaustion respectively, reducing demands seemed to predict exhaustion positively. Our findings suggest that job crafting can act as a strategy of employees to respond to organizational change. While seeking resources and seeking challenges enhance employee adjustment and should be encouraged by managers, reducing demands seems to have unfavorable implications for employees. (PsycINFO Database Record
报告 Paraskevas Petrou、Evangelia Demerouti 和 Wilmar B. Schaufeli 发表在《职业健康心理学杂志》(2015 年 10 月,第 20 卷第 4 期,第 470-480 页)上的“在不断变化的组织中进行工作重塑:疲惫和绩效的前因后果”一文中存在一个错误。图 1 的图例应改为“测试的 SEM 模型。 χ²=76.50,df=30,p<.000,CFI=0.98,TLI=0.92,GFI=0.98,RMSEA=0.05,RMR=0.05;为了清晰起见,显示了具有显著同步相关性的系数。*p≤.05.**p≤.01。”(原始文章的摘要如下所示:2015 年 12642-001。)本研究在组织变革背景下探讨了员工的工作重塑行为(即寻求资源、寻求挑战和减少需求)。我们分别在组织层面(即实施变革对员工工作生活的影响程度)和个体层面(即员工愿意跟随变革的程度)上考察了工作重塑的预测因素。工作重塑行为预计将预测任务绩效和疲惫感。对 580 名正在经历组织变革的警察进行了两次纵向数据分析,采用结构方程模型进行分析。研究结果表明,变革对员工日常工作的影响程度与减少需求和疲惫感有关,而员工改变的意愿与寻求资源和寻求挑战有关。此外,虽然寻求资源和寻求挑战分别与高任务绩效和低疲惫感相关,而减少需求似乎与疲惫感呈正相关。我们的研究结果表明,工作重塑可以作为员工应对组织变革的一种策略。虽然寻求资源和寻求挑战可以增强员工的调整能力,应该得到管理者的鼓励,但减少需求似乎对员工不利。