Järvistö P E, Calhim S, Schuett W, Sirkiä P M, Velmala W, Laaksonen T
Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Section of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
J Evol Biol. 2016 Aug;29(8):1569-84. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12892. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
To understand the consequences of ever-changing environment on the dynamics of phenotypic traits, distinguishing between selection processes and individual plasticity is crucial. We examined individual consistency/plasticity in several male secondary sexual traits expressed during the breeding season (white wing and forehead patch size, UV reflectance of white wing patch and dorsal melanin coloration) in a migratory pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) population over an 11-year period. Furthermore, we studied carry-over effects of three environmental variables (NAO, a climatic index; NDVI, a vegetation index; and rainfall) at the wintering grounds (during prebreeding moult) on the expression of these breeding plumage traits of pied flycatcher males at individual and population levels. Whereas NAO correlates negatively with moisture in West Africa, NDVI correlates positively with primary production. Forehead patch size and melanin coloration were highly consistent within individuals among years, whereas the consistency of the other two traits was moderate. Wing patch size decreased with higher NAO and increased with higher rainfall and NDVI at the individual level. Interestingly, small-patched males suffered lower survival during high NAO winters than large-patched males, and vice versa during low NAO winters. These counteracting processes meant that the individual-level change was masked at the population level where no relationship was found. Our results provide a good example of how variation in the phenotypic composition of a natural population can be a result of both environment-dependent individual plasticity and short-term microevolution. Moreover, when plasticity and viability selection operate simultaneously, their impacts on population composition may not be evident.
为了理解不断变化的环境对表型性状动态的影响,区分选择过程和个体可塑性至关重要。我们在11年的时间里,研究了一个迁徙的斑姬鹟(Ficedula hypoleuca)种群在繁殖季节所表现出的几种雄性第二性征(白色翅斑和前额斑块大小、白色翅斑的紫外线反射率以及背部黑色素沉着)的个体一致性/可塑性。此外,我们还研究了越冬地(繁殖前换羽期间)的三个环境变量(北大西洋涛动,一种气候指数;归一化植被指数;以及降雨量)对斑姬鹟雄性这些繁殖羽色性状在个体和种群水平上表达的遗留效应。北大西洋涛动与西非的湿度呈负相关,而归一化植被指数与初级生产力呈正相关。前额斑块大小和黑色素沉着在个体间多年来高度一致,而其他两个性状的一致性为中等。在个体水平上,翅斑大小随着北大西洋涛动增强而减小,随着降雨量增加和归一化植被指数升高而增大。有趣的是,在北大西洋涛动强烈的冬季,翅斑小的雄性比翅斑大的雄性存活率低,而在北大西洋涛动较弱的冬季则相反。这些相互抵消的过程意味着在种群水平上个体水平的变化被掩盖了,在种群水平上未发现相关关系。我们的研究结果很好地例证了自然种群表型组成的变化如何既可能是环境依赖的个体可塑性的结果,也可能是短期微进化的结果。此外,当可塑性和生存力选择同时起作用时,它们对种群组成的影响可能并不明显。