Price R B, Gerrow J D, Ramier W C
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dalhousie University, Faculty of Dentistry, Halifax, N.S., Canada.
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Feb;61(2):155-60. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90365-x.
This study determined the effect on articulator settings of using an arbitrary hinge axis as compared with the terminal hinge axis in orienting a computerized pantograph on a patient. The effect of an error in measuring the reference plane angle or clutch angle was also determined. Two subjects were pantographed 30 times by using the terminal hinge axis and 30 times by using the arbitrary hinge axis. Statistically the articulator settings obtained by using the arbitrary hinge axis and the terminal hinge axis were different, but the difference was small. One subject was pantographed on 18 occasions by using different reference plane angle and clutch angle settings. Analysis showed that 1-degree change in the reference plane angle setting produced approximately 0.9-degree change in the protrusive and orbiting path articulator settings. A 1-degree change in the clutch angle setting produced approximately 0.9-degree change in the progressive side shift settings. It was concluded that the terminal hinge axis should be used as the posterior reference point and the reference plane angle and clutch angle should be carefully recorded.
本研究确定了在患者身上定位计算机化全景描记仪时,使用任意铰链轴与终末铰链轴相比,对咬合架设置的影响。还确定了测量参考平面角或离合角误差的影响。两名受试者分别使用终末铰链轴进行30次全景描记,使用任意铰链轴进行30次全景描记。从统计学上看,使用任意铰链轴和终末铰链轴获得的咬合架设置有所不同,但差异很小。一名受试者在18次情况下使用不同的参考平面角和离合角设置进行全景描记。分析表明,参考平面角设置1度的变化在前伸和绕圈路径咬合架设置中产生约0.9度的变化。离合角设置1度的变化在渐进侧方移动设置中产生约0.9度的变化。得出的结论是,应使用终末铰链轴作为后参考点,并且应仔细记录参考平面角和离合角。