Suppr超能文献

英国股腘动脉疾病血管内药物洗脱治疗的经济学分析

Economic analysis of endovascular drug-eluting treatments for femoropopliteal artery disease in the UK.

作者信息

Katsanos Konstantinos, Geisler Benjamin P, Garner Abigail M, Zayed Hany, Cleveland Trevor, Pietzsch Jan B

机构信息

Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Wing Tech Inc., Menlo Park, California, USA Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 May 9;6(5):e011245. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011245.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the clinical and economic impact of drug-eluting endovascular treatment strategies for femoropopliteal artery disease compared with current standard of care.

DESIGN

Systematic literature search to pool target lesion revascularisations (TLR). Model-based per-patient cost impact and quasi-cost-effectiveness projection over 24 months based on pooled TLRs and current reimbursement.

SETTING

The UK's National Health Service (NHS).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients presenting with symptomatic femoropopliteal disease eligible for endovascular treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline-recommended treatment with percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) and bailout bare metal stenting (BMS) versus primary BMS placement, or drug-coated balloon (DCB), or drug-eluting stent (DES) treatment.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

24-month per-patient cost impact to NHS (primary outcome).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

pooled 24-month TLR rates; numbers needed to treat (NNTs); cost per TLR avoided and estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in £ per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

RESULTS

N=28 studies were identified, reporting on 5167 femoropopliteal lesions. Over 24 months, DCB, DES and BMS reduced TLRs of de novo lesions from 36.2% to 17.6%, 19.4% and 26.9%, respectively, at an increased cost of £43, £44 and £112. NNTs to avoid 1 TLR in 24 months were 5.4, 6.0 and 10.8, resulting in cost per TLR avoided of £231, £264 and £1204. DCB was estimated to add 0.011 QALYs, DES 0.010 QALYs and BMS 0.005 QALYs, resulting in estimated ICERs of £3983, £4534 and £20 719 per QALY gained. A subset analysis revealed more favourable clinical and economic outcomes for a 3.5 µg/mm(2) DCB with urea excipient, compared with the rest of DCBs. A modest reduction of 10% in DCB and DES prices made drug-eluting treatments dominant.

CONCLUSIONS

Widespread adoption of drug-eluting endovascular therapies for femoropopliteal disease would add meaningful clinical benefit at reasonable additional costs to the NHS. Based on currently available data, DCBs offer the highest clinical and economic value.

摘要

目的

评估与当前护理标准相比,药物洗脱血管内治疗策略对股腘动脉疾病的临床和经济影响。

设计

系统文献检索以汇总靶病变血管重建术(TLR)。基于汇总的TLR和当前报销情况,对每位患者24个月的成本影响和准成本效益进行模型预测。

设置

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)。

参与者

出现有症状股腘动脉疾病且适合血管内治疗的患者。

干预措施

当前国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南推荐的经皮腔内球囊血管成形术(PTA)和补救性裸金属支架置入术(BMS)与初次BMS置入、或药物涂层球囊(DCB)、或药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗。

主要和次要结局指标

NHS每位患者24个月的成本影响(主要结局)。

次要结局

汇总的24个月TLR率;需治疗人数(NNT);避免每次TLR的成本以及每质量调整生命年(QALY)以英镑计的估计增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

共纳入28项研究,报告了5167个股腘动脉病变。在24个月期间,DCB、DES和BMS将新发病变的TLR分别从36.2%降至17.6%、19.4%和26.9%,成本分别增加43英镑、44英镑和112英镑。24个月内避免1次TLR的NNT分别为5.4、6.0和10.8,避免每次TLR的成本分别为231英镑、264英镑和1204英镑。估计DCB可增加0.011个QALY,DES增加0.010个QALY,BMS增加0.005个QALY,每获得1个QALY的估计ICER分别为3983英镑、4534英镑和20719英镑。亚组分析显示,与其他DCB相比,含尿素赋形剂的3.5µg/mm(2) DCB具有更有利的临床和经济结局。DCB和DES价格适度降低10%使药物洗脱治疗占主导地位。

结论

广泛采用药物洗脱血管内疗法治疗股腘动脉疾病将为NHS带来有意义的临床益处,且成本增加合理。基于现有数据,DCB具有最高的临床和经济价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7237/4874117/aeca38c2643f/bmjopen2016011245f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验