Maaskant J, Raymakers-Janssen P, Veldhoen E, Ista E, Lucas C, Vermeulen H
Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Pain. 2016 Nov;20(10):1587-1611. doi: 10.1002/ejp.880. Epub 2016 May 10.
The COMFORT scale is a measurement tool to assess distress, sedation and pain in nonverbal paediatric patients. Several studies have described the COMFORT scale, but no formal assessment of the methodological quality has been undertaken. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to study the clinimetric properties of the (modified) COMFORT scale in children up to 18 years. We searched Central, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycInfo and Web of Science until December 2014. The selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Quality of the included studies was appraised using the COSMIN checklist. We found 30 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Most participants were ventilated children up to 4 years without neurological disorders. The results on internal consistency and interrater reliability showed values of >0.70 in most studies, indicating an adequate reliability. Construct validity resulted in correlations between 0.68 and 0.84 for distress, between 0.42 and 0.94 for sedation and between 0.31 and 0.96 for pain. The responsiveness of the (modified) COMFORT scale seems to be adequate. The quality of the included studies ranged from poor to excellent. The COMFORT scale shows overall an adequate reliability in providing information on distress, sedation and pain. Construct validity varies from good to excellent for distress, from moderate to excellent for sedation, and from poor to excellent for pain. The included studies were clinically and methodologically heterogeneous, hampering firm conclusions. WHAT DOES THIS REVIEW ADD?: An in-depth assessment of the clinimetric properties of the COMFORT scale. The COMFORT scale shows overall an adequate reliability in providing information on distress, sedation and pain. Construct validity varies from good to excellent for distress, from moderate to excellent for sedation, and from poor to excellent for pain.
COMFORT量表是一种用于评估非语言儿童患者痛苦、镇静和疼痛程度的测量工具。已有多项研究描述了COMFORT量表,但尚未对其方法学质量进行正式评估。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价,以研究(改良)COMFORT量表在18岁以下儿童中的测量学特性。我们检索了截至2014年12月的CENTRAL、CINAHL、Embase、Medline、PsycInfo和Web of Science数据库。由两名评价者独立进行文献筛选、数据提取和质量评估。采用COSMIN清单对纳入研究的质量进行评价。我们发现30项研究符合纳入标准。大多数参与者是4岁以下无神经系统疾病的通气儿童。大多数研究中,内部一致性和评分者间信度的结果值>0.70,表明信度充足。结构效度方面,痛苦程度的相关性在0.68至0.84之间,镇静程度的相关性在0.42至0.94之间,疼痛程度的相关性在0.31至0.96之间。(改良)COMFORT量表的反应度似乎充足。纳入研究的质量从差到优不等。COMFORT量表总体上在提供痛苦、镇静和疼痛信息方面具有足够的信度。痛苦程度的结构效度从良好到优秀不等,镇静程度的结构效度从中度到优秀不等,疼痛程度的结构效度从差到优秀不等。纳入研究在临床和方法学上存在异质性,妨碍了得出确切结论。本评价增加了什么内容?:对COMFORT量表测量学特性的深入评估。COMFORT量表总体上在提供痛苦、镇静和疼痛信息方面具有足够的信度。痛苦程度的结构效度从良好到优秀不等,镇静程度的结构效度从中度到优秀不等,疼痛程度的结构效度从差到优秀不等。