Self Wesley H, Wunderink Richard G, Williams Derek J, Zhu Yuwei, Anderson Evan J, Balk Robert A, Fakhran Sherene S, Chappell James D, Casimir Geoffrey, Courtney D Mark, Trabue Christopher, Waterer Grant W, Bramley Anna, Magill Shelley, Jain Seema, Edwards Kathryn M, Grijalva Carlos G
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 1;63(3):300-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw300. Epub 2016 May 8.
Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and its clinical features remain incompletely understood, complicating empirical selection of antibiotics.
Using a multicenter, prospective surveillance study of adults hospitalized with CAP, we calculated the prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) among all CAP episodes. We compared the epidemiologic, radiographic, and clinical characteristics of S. aureus CAP (per respiratory or blood culture) with those of pneumococcal (per respiratory or blood culture or urine antigen) and all-cause non-S. aureus CAP using descriptive statistics.
Among 2259 adults hospitalized for CAP, 37 (1.6%) had S. aureus identified, including 15 (0.7%) with MRSA and 22 (1.0%) with MSSA; 115 (5.1%) had Streptococcus pneumoniae Vancomycin or linezolid was administered to 674 (29.8%) patients within the first 3 days of hospitalization. Chronic hemodialysis use was more common among patients with MRSA (20.0%) than pneumococcal (2.6%) and all-cause non-S. aureus (3.7%) CAP. Otherwise, clinical features at admission were similar, including concurrent influenza infection, hemoptysis, multilobar infiltrates, and prehospital antibiotics. Patients with MRSA CAP had more severe clinical outcomes than those with pneumococcal CAP, including intensive care unit admission (86.7% vs 34.8%) and in-patient mortality (13.3% vs 4.4%).
Despite very low prevalence of S. aureus and, specifically, MRSA, nearly one-third of adults hospitalized with CAP received anti-MRSA antibiotics. The clinical presentation of MRSA CAP overlapped substantially with pneumococcal CAP, highlighting the challenge of accurately targeting empirical anti-MRSA antibiotics with currently available clinical tools and the need for new diagnostic strategies.
金黄色葡萄球菌社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的患病率及其临床特征仍未完全明确,这使得抗生素的经验性选择变得复杂。
通过一项针对因CAP住院的成年人的多中心前瞻性监测研究,我们计算了所有CAP病例中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)的患病率。我们使用描述性统计方法,比较了金黄色葡萄球菌CAP(通过呼吸道或血培养确诊)与肺炎球菌CAP(通过呼吸道或血培养或尿抗原确诊)以及所有非金黄色葡萄球菌CAP的流行病学、影像学和临床特征。
在2259例因CAP住院的成年人中,有37例(1.6%)被鉴定为金黄色葡萄球菌感染,其中15例(0.7%)为MRSA感染,22例(1.0%)为MSSA感染;115例(5.1%)为肺炎链球菌感染。在住院的前3天内,674例(29.8%)患者接受了万古霉素或利奈唑胺治疗。慢性血液透析在MRSA感染患者(20.0%)中比肺炎球菌感染患者(2.6%)和所有非金黄色葡萄球菌感染的CAP患者(3.7%)中更为常见。否则,入院时的临床特征相似,包括并发流感感染、咯血、多叶浸润和院前使用抗生素。MRSA CAP患者的临床结局比肺炎球菌CAP患者更严重,包括入住重症监护病房(86.7%对34.8%)和住院死亡率(13.3%对4.4%)。
尽管金黄色葡萄球菌,特别是MRSA的患病率非常低,但近三分之一因CAP住院的成年人接受了抗MRSA抗生素治疗。MRSA CAP的临床表现与肺炎球菌CAP有很大重叠,这突出了使用现有临床工具准确靶向经验性抗MRSA抗生素的挑战以及对新诊断策略的需求。