Suppr超能文献

小梁切除术与Ex-Press青光眼滤过装置治疗硅油乳化继发硅巨噬细胞性开角型青光眼的对比

Trabeculectomy Versus Ex-Press Glaucoma Filtration Device in Silicomacrophagocytic Open Angle Glaucoma Secondary to Silicone Oil Emulsification.

作者信息

Errico Donato, Scrimieri Francesca Luigia, Riccardi Roberta, Iarossi Giancarlo

机构信息

Ophthalmology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera "Cardinale G. Panico", Lecce, Italy.

Department of Ophthalmology, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr-Jun;23(2):177-82. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.175889.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of Ex-PRESS device implantation versus trabeculectomy in patients with ocular hypertension after pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil injection (SOI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive eyes with ocular hypertension after pars plana vitrectomy and SOI were included in this study and randomized to one of two groups: A group treated with Ex-PRESS (model P50) placed under a scleral flap (Ex-PRESS group), and a group treated with trabeculectomy (trabeculectomy group). Complete success (intraocular pressure [IOP] <21 mmHg without medication) and qualified success rates (IOP <21 mmHg with one or two glaucoma medications) at 2 years postoperatively were analyzed. Between-groups comparison was performed with the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables, and Fischer exact test for categorical data. Success rates between groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier life analysis and the log-rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In the Ex-PRESS group, complete success was achieved in 73% eyes and qualified success in 81.8% of eyes. In the trabeculectomy group, complete success was achieved in 40% and qualified success was achieved in 60% of eyes. The difference in mean IOP between groups was statistically significant from the 3(rd) postoperative month onward (P = 0.007 at 3 months, P = 0.003 at 6 months, and P = 0.03 at 24 months).

CONCLUSION

Ex-PRESS implantation was more effective than trabeculectomy in controlling IOP in ocular hypertensives after pars plana vitrectomy and SOI, but the surgical technique may require improvement.

摘要

目的

比较扁平部玻璃体切除术联合硅油注入(SOI)后高眼压患者植入Ex-PRESS装置与小梁切除术的效果。

材料与方法

本研究纳入26例连续的扁平部玻璃体切除术联合SOI后出现高眼压的患眼,并随机分为两组:一组采用巩膜瓣下植入Ex-PRESS(P50型号)进行治疗(Ex-PRESS组),另一组采用小梁切除术进行治疗(小梁切除术组)。分析术后2年的完全成功率(眼压[IOP]<21 mmHg且无需药物治疗)和合格成功率(眼压<21 mmHg且使用一种或两种青光眼药物)。连续变量采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行组间比较,分类数据采用Fischer精确检验。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和对数秩检验比较两组的成功率。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

Ex-PRESS组中,73%的患眼实现了完全成功,81.8%的患眼实现了合格成功。小梁切除术组中,40%的患眼实现了完全成功,60%的患眼实现了合格成功。两组之间平均眼压的差异从术后第3个月起具有统计学意义(3个月时P = 0.007,6个月时P = 0.003,24个月时P = 0.03)。

结论

在扁平部玻璃体切除术联合SOI后的高眼压患者中,植入Ex-PRESS比小梁切除术在控制眼压方面更有效,但手术技术可能需要改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f234/4845615/212870ee587f/MEAJO-23-177-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验