Yaghoubifard Saeed, Rashidian Arash, Kebriaeezadeh Abbas, Sheidaei Ali, Varmaghani Mehdi, Hashemi-Meshkini Amir, Zekri Hedieh-Sadat
Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Pharmaceutical Administration and Pharmacoeconomics Research Center (PAPRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Pharmaceutical Administration and Pharmacoeconomics Research Center (PAPRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Health Management and Economics, Tehran, Iran; Knowledge Utilization Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Res Pharm Pract. 2016 Apr-Jun;5(2):106-15. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.179572.
To develop a valid and reliable instrument in the Persian language for evaluating patient satisfaction with services provided in community pharmacies.
We selected a valid and reliable instrument from the literature and translated it to the Persian language. Some new items were added to the first draft based on the special characteristics of the Iranian health system. Then, the feasibility of utilizing the new instrument was assessed. In the third step, we conducted a formal content validity study to calculate content validity indices. Having completed the content validity study, the factorial structure of new instruments was determined by implementing a factorial analysis. Finally, the reliability of the instrument was assessed by assessment of Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability.
The developed instrument demonstrated suitable validity and reliability. The final instrument showed desirable content validity, with inter-rater agreement of 94% and 97% for relevance and clarity, respectively. Scale content validity indices for relevance and clarity were calculated as 96% and 92%, respectively, and comprehensiveness was calculated as 100%. Factor analysis resulted in seven factors with a cumulative variance of 62.14%. In internal consistency reliability, Cronbach's alpha for the whole instrument was 0.912. About test-retest reliability, six items showed almost perfect agreement, 18 items showed substantial agreement, and three items showed moderate agreement. Therefore, test-retest reliability assessment too demonstrated appropriate results.
The instrument demonstrated excellent validity and reliability for application in Iran. This instrument is useful for evaluating patient satisfaction with services provided in community pharmacies in the Persian-speaking communities.
开发一种波斯语的有效且可靠的工具,用于评估患者对社区药房提供服务的满意度。
我们从文献中选取了一种有效且可靠的工具并将其翻译成波斯语。基于伊朗卫生系统的特殊特征,在初稿中添加了一些新项目。然后,评估了使用新工具的可行性。第三步,我们进行了正式的内容效度研究以计算内容效度指标。完成内容效度研究后,通过实施因子分析确定新工具的因子结构。最后,通过评估克朗巴哈系数和重测信度来评估该工具的信度。
所开发的工具显示出合适的效度和信度。最终工具显示出理想的内容效度,评分者间相关性和清晰度的一致性分别为94%和97%。相关性和清晰度的量表内容效度指标分别计算为96%和92%,全面性计算为100%。因子分析得出七个因子,累积方差为62.14%。在内部一致性信度方面,整个工具的克朗巴哈系数为0.912。关于重测信度,六个项目显示几乎完全一致,18个项目显示高度一致,三个项目显示中度一致。因此,重测信度评估也显示出合适的结果。
该工具在伊朗应用时显示出优异的效度和信度。该工具可用于评估波斯语社区患者对社区药房提供服务的满意度。