Suppr超能文献

Wolfram 统一评定量表(WURS)的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS).

机构信息

Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St, Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012 Nov 14;7:89. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-89.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wolfram syndrome (WFS) is a rare, neurodegenerative disease that typically presents with childhood onset insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, followed by optic atrophy, diabetes insipidus, deafness, and neurological and psychiatric dysfunction. There is no cure for the disease, but recent advances in research have improved understanding of the disease course. Measuring disease severity and progression with reliable and validated tools is a prerequisite for clinical trials of any new intervention for neurodegenerative conditions. To this end, we developed the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) to measure the severity and individual variability of WFS symptoms. The aim of this study is to develop and test the reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS).

METHODS

A rating scale of disease severity in WFS was developed by modifying a standardized assessment for another neurodegenerative condition (Batten disease). WFS experts scored the representativeness of WURS items for the disease. The WURS was administered to 13 individuals with WFS (6-25 years of age). Motor, balance, mood and quality of life were also evaluated with standard instruments. Inter-rater reliability, internal consistency reliability, concurrent, predictive and content validity of the WURS were calculated.

RESULTS

The WURS had high inter-rater reliability (ICCs>.93), moderate to high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.78-0.91) and demonstrated good concurrent and predictive validity. There were significant correlations between the WURS Physical Assessment and motor and balance tests (rs>.67, p<.03), between the WURS Behavioral Scale and reports of mood and behavior (rs>.76, p<.04) and between WURS Total scores and quality of life (rs=-.86, p=.001). The WURS demonstrated acceptable content validity (Scale-Content Validity Index=0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary findings demonstrate that the WURS has acceptable reliability and validity and captures individual differences in disease severity in children and young adults with WFS.

摘要

背景

Wolfram 综合征(WFS)是一种罕见的神经退行性疾病,通常表现为儿童期发病的胰岛素依赖型糖尿病,随后出现视神经萎缩、尿崩症、耳聋以及神经和精神功能障碍。目前尚无治愈该病的方法,但最近的研究进展提高了人们对疾病进程的认识。使用可靠且经过验证的工具来衡量疾病的严重程度和进展情况,是对任何新的神经退行性疾病干预措施进行临床试验的前提。为此,我们开发了 Wolfram 统一评分量表(WURS)来衡量 WFS 症状的严重程度和个体差异。本研究旨在开发和测试 Wolfram 统一评分量表(WURS)的可靠性和有效性。

方法

通过修改另一种神经退行性疾病(Batten 病)的标准化评估方法,制定了 WFS 疾病严重程度的评分量表。WFS 专家对 WURS 项目对该疾病的代表性进行评分。对 13 名 WFS 患者(6-25 岁)进行了 WURS 评估。还使用标准仪器评估了运动、平衡、情绪和生活质量。计算了 WURS 的组内一致性信度、内部一致性信度、同时效度、预测效度和内容效度。

结果

WURS 的组内一致性信度较高(ICC>.93),内部一致性信度中等至较高(Cronbach's α = 0.78-0.91),具有良好的同时效度和预测效度。WURS 体格评估与运动和平衡测试之间存在显著相关性(rs>.67,p<.03),WURS 行为量表与情绪和行为报告之间存在显著相关性(rs>.76,p<.04),WURS 总分与生活质量之间存在显著相关性(rs=-.86,p=.001)。WURS 具有可接受的内容效度(量表内容效度指数=0.83)。

结论

这些初步发现表明,WURS 具有可接受的信度和效度,可捕捉到 WFS 儿童和青少年患者疾病严重程度的个体差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d936/3552944/03be3efe7a4e/1750-1172-7-89-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验