Department of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, Centre Universitaire de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Pediatric, Division of Infectious Diseases, King AbdulAziz Medical City, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah. Saudi Arabia.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jul;71(7):1786-99. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw099. Epub 2016 May 10.
Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is increasingly used in clinical practice. However, the utility of voriconazole TDM to guide therapy remains uncertain and controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies assessing the relationship between voriconazole serum concentration and clinical outcomes of success and toxicity.
We searched bibliographic databases for studies on voriconazole serum concentrations and clinical outcomes. We compared success outcomes between patients with therapeutic and subtherapeutic voriconazole serum concentrations, and toxicity outcomes between patients with and without supratherapeutic serum concentrations.
Twenty-four studies were analysed. Pooled analysis for efficacy endpoint demonstrated that patients with therapeutic voriconazole serum concentrations (1.0-2.2 mg/L) were more likely to have successful outcomes compared with those with subtherapeutic voriconazole serum concentrations (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.39-3.81). A therapeutic threshold of 1.0 mg/L was most predictive of successful outcome (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.04-3.62). Patients with therapeutic concentrations did not have better survival rates. Pooled analysis for toxicity endpoint demonstrated that patients with supratherapeutic voriconazole serum concentrations (4.0-6.0 mg/L) were at increased risk of toxicity (OR 4.17; 95% CI 2.08-8.36). A supratherapeutic threshold of 6.0 mg/L was most predictive of toxicity (OR 4.60; 95% CI 1.49-14.16).
Patients with therapeutic voriconazole serum concentrations were twice as likely to achieve successful outcomes. The likelihood of toxicity associated with supratherapeutic voriconazole serum concentrations was 4-fold that of therapeutic concentrations. Our findings suggest that the use of voriconazole TDM to aim for serum concentrations between 1.0 and 6.0 mg/L during therapy may be warranted to optimize clinical success and minimize toxicity.
伏立康唑治疗药物监测(TDM)在临床实践中越来越多地被使用。然而,伏立康唑 TDM 指导治疗的效果仍然不确定且存在争议。我们对评估伏立康唑血清浓度与临床疗效和毒性之间关系的研究进行了荟萃分析。
我们检索了关于伏立康唑血清浓度与临床结局的文献数据库。我们比较了治疗浓度和亚治疗浓度患者之间的疗效结局,以及治疗浓度和超治疗浓度患者之间的毒性结局。
共分析了 24 项研究。疗效终点的汇总分析表明,与亚治疗浓度的患者相比,治疗浓度(1.0-2.2mg/L)的患者更有可能获得成功结局(OR 2.30;95%CI 1.39-3.81)。治疗浓度 1.0mg/L 最能预测成功结局(OR 1.94;95%CI 1.04-3.62)。治疗浓度患者的生存率并没有提高。毒性终点的汇总分析表明,与治疗浓度的患者相比,超治疗浓度(4.0-6.0mg/L)的患者发生毒性的风险增加(OR 4.17;95%CI 2.08-8.36)。超治疗浓度 6.0mg/L 最能预测毒性(OR 4.60;95%CI 1.49-14.16)。
治疗浓度的患者有两倍的可能性获得成功结局。与治疗浓度相比,超治疗浓度与毒性相关的可能性增加了 4 倍。我们的研究结果表明,在治疗过程中使用伏立康唑 TDM 将血清浓度目标设定在 1.0-6.0mg/L 之间,可能有助于优化临床疗效并降低毒性。