White S C, Weissman D D
J Am Dent Assoc. 1977 Dec;95(6):1117-21. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0200.
Panoramic and intraoral periapical radiographs were compared for their demonstration of pathologic conditions in patients seeking general dental care. Panoramic views allowed additional detection of noteworthy lesions that were not detected by intraoral survey in 5.3% of the cases reviewed, with only 0.1% or one patient in 1,000 possibly requiring treatment. The paucity and lack of urgency of the pathologic conditions discovered solely by panoramic radiography suggest that the expectation of a high incidence of detection of such conditions cannot be used as the sole rationale for the routine use of this procedure as an adjunct to the intraoral survey.
对全景片和口内根尖片在寻求普通牙科治疗的患者中对病理状况的显示情况进行了比较。在回顾的病例中,全景片能额外检测出5.3%的口内检查未发现的值得关注的病变,其中仅0.1%(即每1000名患者中有1名)可能需要治疗。仅通过全景片发现的病理状况较少且不紧急,这表明不能将期望此类状况有高检出率作为将该检查作为口内检查辅助手段常规使用的唯一理由。