Faerber Stella J, Kaufmann Jürgen M, Leder Helmut, Martin Eva Maria, Schweinberger Stefan R
DFG Research Unit Person Perception, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
Department of General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Jena, Germany.
PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0155380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155380. eCollection 2016.
According to the norm-based version of the multidimensional face space model (nMDFS, Valentine, 1991), any given face and its corresponding anti-face (which deviates from the norm in exactly opposite direction as the original face) should be equidistant to a hypothetical prototype face (norm), such that by definition face and anti-face should bear the same level of perceived typicality. However, it has been argued that familiarity affects perceived typicality and that representations of familiar faces are qualitatively different (e.g., more robust and image-independent) from those for unfamiliar faces. Here we investigated the role of face familiarity for rated typicality, using two frequently used operationalisations of typicality (deviation-based: DEV), and distinctiveness (face in the crowd: FITC) for faces of celebrities and their corresponding anti-faces. We further assessed attractiveness, likeability and trustworthiness ratings of the stimuli, which are potentially related to typicality. For unfamiliar faces and their corresponding anti-faces, in line with the predictions of the nMDFS, our results demonstrate comparable levels of perceived typicality (DEV). In contrast, familiar faces were perceived much less typical than their anti-faces. Furthermore, familiar faces were rated higher than their anti-faces in distinctiveness, attractiveness, likability and trustworthiness. These findings suggest that familiarity strongly affects the distribution of facial representations in norm-based face space. Overall, our study suggests (1) that familiarity needs to be considered in studies of mental representations of faces, and (2) that familiarity, general distance-to-norm and more specific vector directions in face space make different and interactive contributions to different types of facial evaluations.
根据多维面部空间模型的基于规范版本(nMDFS,瓦伦丁,1991),任何给定的面部及其相应的反面部(与原始面部在完全相反的方向上偏离规范)应该与一个假设的原型面部(规范)等距,因此根据定义,面部和反面部应该具有相同水平的感知典型性。然而,有人认为熟悉度会影响感知典型性,并且熟悉面孔的表征在质量上与不熟悉面孔的表征不同(例如,更稳健且与图像无关)。在这里,我们使用两种常用的典型性操作化方法(基于偏差:DEV)和独特性(人群中的面孔:FITC),研究了面部熟悉度对名人面部及其相应反面部的典型性评分的作用。我们还评估了刺激的吸引力、可爱度和可信度评分,这些评分可能与典型性相关。对于不熟悉的面孔及其相应的反面部,与nMDFS的预测一致,我们的结果表明感知典型性水平相当(DEV)。相比之下,熟悉的面孔被认为比其反面部的典型性要低得多。此外,熟悉的面孔在独特性、吸引力、可爱度和可信度方面的评分高于其反面部。这些发现表明,熟悉度强烈影响基于规范的面部空间中面部表征的分布。总体而言,我们的研究表明:(1)在面部心理表征研究中需要考虑熟悉度;(2)熟悉度、到规范的一般距离以及面部空间中更具体的向量方向对不同类型的面部评价有不同且相互作用的贡献。