Papaioannou Vasilios, Chouvarda Ioanna, Gaertner Elizabeth, Benyamina Mourad, Ferry Axelle, Maurel Veronique, Soussi Sabri, Blet Alice, Chaouat Marc, Plaud Benoît, Mebazaa Alexandre, Legrand Matthieu
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Hôpitaux Universitaire St-Louis-Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75010 Paris, France.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Lab of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
Burns. 2016 Nov;42(7):1445-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 May 8.
Dressing changes induce acute pain in burn patients. This pain is difficult to predict and may be therefore undertreated. Two different non-invasive electrophysiological indices from heart rate variability and baroreflex inhibition-derived indices, analgesia/nociception index (ANI) and cardiovascular depth of analgesia (CARDEAN), have been proposed to predict and better assess adequacy of anti-nociception. The aim of this study was to evaluate these techniques as early pain alert tools in conscious burnt patients during dressing changes' procedures.
Twenty adult burnt patients undergoing scheduled wound treatment procedures were included in this prospective observational study. Pain intensity was assessed using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) and was compared with both ANI and CARDEAN, during the procedures. Non parametric rank sum test and linear discriminant analysis were used for evaluating potential differences of measured variables between periods with different pain intensities. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to assess their performance to detect pain within following 15s.
The sensitivity and specificity of ANI to detect pain were 67% and 70% and those of CARDEAN were 77% and 80%, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.75 and 0.83, respectively. Their combination increased AUC to 0.87.
Both ANI and CARDEAN indices during wound treatment procedures seem to discriminate periods with and without pain within 15s, serving as a potential complementary tool for early optimized pain control.
换药会给烧伤患者带来急性疼痛。这种疼痛难以预测,因此可能未得到充分治疗。已提出两种不同的非侵入性电生理指标,即心率变异性和压力反射抑制衍生指标、镇痛/伤害感受指数(ANI)和心血管镇痛深度(CARDEAN),用于预测和更好地评估抗伤害感受的充分性。本研究的目的是评估这些技术作为清醒烧伤患者换药过程中早期疼痛警报工具的效果。
本前瞻性观察研究纳入了20名接受定期伤口治疗的成年烧伤患者。在操作过程中,使用0-10数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛强度,并与ANI和CARDEAN进行比较。采用非参数秩和检验和线性判别分析来评估不同疼痛强度时期测量变量的潜在差异。绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线以评估它们在接下来15秒内检测疼痛的性能。
ANI检测疼痛的敏感性和特异性分别为67%和70%,CARDEAN的敏感性和特异性分别为77%和80%,曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.75和0.83。它们的组合使AUC提高到0.87。
伤口治疗过程中的ANI和CARDEAN指标似乎都能在15秒内区分有无疼痛的时期,可作为早期优化疼痛控制的潜在补充工具。