• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健连续性改善糖尿病健康结局:从免费诊所到联邦合格健康中心。

Primary Care Continuity Improves Diabetic Health Outcomes: From Free Clinics to Federally Qualified Health Centers.

作者信息

Mehta Priya P, Santiago-Torres Juan E, Wisely C Ellis, Hartmann Katherine, Makadia Frini A, Welker Mary Jo, Habash Diane L

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL (PPM); and the Department of Family Medicine (MJW) and the Center for Integrative Health and Wellness (DH), The Ohio State University College of Medicine (FAM, JS-T, EW, KH), Columbus.

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):318-24. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150256.

DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150256
PMID:27170789
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are a number of well-established barriers to accessing primary care. The LINKED Study set out to improve primary care usage through 1-on-1 counseling and referrals for patients with diabetes being treated at local free clinics. We hypothesized that this educational intervention paired with expedited referral would increase the use of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) as a source of health care and ultimately lead to improved diabetic health.

METHODS

Medical student volunteers counseled participants on the importance of primary care. The participants then completed surveys about diabetic health, socioeconomic status, and general demographics. Participants were subsequently assigned to 1 of 2 FQHCs; designated care coordinators facilitated appointments. At the end of a 9-month action period, participants repeated the initial surveys, now including appointment history and health data (hemoglobin A1c (%) [HbA1c], body mass index).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight participants were enrolled. The average time since a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was 8.3 years (standard deviation [SD], 8.4 years), and 25% of participants used insulin. Mean baseline HbA1c for participants with a recorded value (n = 55) was 9.5 (SD, 2.5). FQHC appointments were scheduled by 68% of participants; 38% of the participants attended ≥2 appointments. The most common reported barriers to accessing primary care were no prior health insurance (85.3%) and cost of medical care (72.1%). In our follow-up assessment there was a statistically significant decrease in HbA1c for those linked to FQHCs (9.5 [SD, 2.3] to 8.3 [SD, 2.2]; n = 21).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the utility of a linkage program from free clinics to FQHCs. Those individuals with diabetes receiving health care from an FQHC demonstrated improved glycemic control.

摘要

引言

获得初级保健存在许多既定的障碍。“联系研究”旨在通过为在当地免费诊所接受治疗的糖尿病患者提供一对一咨询和转诊服务,来提高初级保健的利用率。我们假设这种教育干预与加速转诊相结合,会增加将联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs)作为医疗保健来源的使用,并最终改善糖尿病患者的健康状况。

方法

医学生志愿者就初级保健的重要性对参与者进行咨询。参与者随后完成了关于糖尿病健康状况、社会经济地位和一般人口统计学的调查。参与者随后被分配到两家FQHC中的一家;指定的护理协调员协助安排预约。在为期9个月的行动期结束时,参与者重复了最初的调查,现在包括预约历史和健康数据(糖化血红蛋白(%)[HbA1c]、体重指数)。

结果

招募了68名参与者。自诊断糖尿病以来的平均时间为8.3年(标准差[SD],8.4年),25%的参与者使用胰岛素。有记录值的参与者(n = 55)的平均基线HbA1c为9.5(SD,2.5)。68%的参与者安排了FQHC预约;38%的参与者参加了≥2次预约。报告的获得初级保健最常见障碍是以前没有医疗保险(85.3%)和医疗费用(72.1%)。在我们的随访评估中,与FQHCs建立联系的参与者的HbA1c有统计学意义的下降(从9.5 [SD,2.3]降至8.3 [SD,2.2];n = 21)。

结论

本研究证明了从免费诊所到FQHCs的联系项目的效用。那些从FQHCs接受医疗保健的糖尿病患者血糖控制得到改善。

相似文献

1
Primary Care Continuity Improves Diabetic Health Outcomes: From Free Clinics to Federally Qualified Health Centers.初级保健连续性改善糖尿病健康结局:从免费诊所到联邦合格健康中心。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):318-24. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150256.
2
Access points for the underserved: primary care appointment availability at federally qualified health centers in 10 States.为服务不足人群提供的接入点:10个州联邦合格健康中心的初级保健预约服务可及性
Med Care. 2014 Sep;52(9):818-25. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000184.
3
Improving Chronic Disease Outcomes Through Medication Therapy Management in Federally Qualified Health Centers.通过联邦合格健康中心的药物治疗管理改善慢性病治疗效果
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Oct;8(4):324-331. doi: 10.1177/2150131917701797. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Follow-up to a federally qualified health center and subsequent emergency department utilization.在联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)就诊后的后续利用情况,以及后续对急诊部门的利用情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;17(1):55-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00621.x.
5
Barriers to control of blood glucose in diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者血糖控制的障碍
Am J Med Qual. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):16-25. doi: 10.1177/106286060001500104.
6
A cluster-randomized trial to estimate the effect of mobile screening and treatment feedback on HbA1c and diabetes-related complications in Tshwane primary health care clinics, South Africa.一项整群随机试验,旨在评估南非茨瓦内初级卫生保健诊所的移动筛查及治疗反馈对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和糖尿病相关并发症的影响。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 Dec;11(6):546-554. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
7
Shared medical appointments based on the chronic care model: a quality improvement project to address the challenges of patients with diabetes with high cardiovascular risk.基于慢性病护理模式的共享医疗预约:一项应对心血管高风险糖尿病患者挑战的质量改进项目。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct;16(5):349-53. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019158.
8
Improved glycemic control in veterans with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus using a Specialty Care Access Network-Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes model at primary care clinics.在初级保健诊所采用社区医疗成果专科护理接入网络扩展模式改善糖尿病控制不佳退伍军人的血糖控制情况。
J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Jun;22(4):221-4. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15598052. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
9
The diabetes healthy outcomes program: results of free health care for uninsured at a federally qualified community health center.糖尿病健康成果项目:联邦合格社区健康中心为未参保者提供免费医疗保健的结果
J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):4-8. doi: 10.1177/2150131913481807. Epub 2013 Mar 17.
10
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.

引用本文的文献

1
National assessment of health center readiness to train health profession students.对健康中心培训卫生专业学生准备情况的全国性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13046-4.
2
Medical digital twins: enabling precision medicine and medical artificial intelligence.医学数字孪生:推动精准医学与医学人工智能发展
Lancet Digit Health. 2025 Jun 14:100864. doi: 10.1016/j.landig.2025.02.004.
3
Federally Qualified Health Center Penetration Associated With Reduced Community COVID-19 Mortality in Four United States Cities.
联邦合格的健康中心渗透率与美国四个城市的社区 COVID-19 死亡率降低相关。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221138422. doi: 10.1177/21501319221138422.
4
An Economic Impact Model for Estimating the Value to Health Systems of a Digital Intervention for Diabetes Primary Care: Development and Usefulness Study.一种用于评估糖尿病初级保健数字干预对卫生系统价值的经济影响模型:开发与效用研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 26;6(9):e37745. doi: 10.2196/37745.
5
Patient Outcomes from Student-Run Health Services: An Integrative Review.学生运营的健康服务的患者结局:一项综合综述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Mar 30;15:641-665. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S348411. eCollection 2022.
6
Geographic access to federally qualified health centers before and after the affordable care act.平价医疗法案实施前后,获得联邦合格健康中心的地理可及性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 23;22(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07685-0.
7
Assessing clinical quality performance and staffing capacity differences between urban and rural Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers in the United States: A cross sectional study.评估美国城市和农村卫生资源和服务管理局资助的健康中心之间的临床质量绩效和人员配备能力差异:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 8;15(12):e0242844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242844. eCollection 2020.
8
New model of integrated care for uncontrolled type 2 diabetes in a retrospective, underserved adult population in the USA: a study protocol for an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.美国回顾性未满足需求成年人群中 2 型糖尿病不可控患者的综合护理新模式:一项有效性和成本效益分析的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e038084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038084.
9
Effect of student-led health interventions on patient outcomes for those with cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review.学生主导的健康干预对心血管疾病或心血管疾病危险因素患者结局的影响:系统评价。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jul 11;20(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01602-1.
10
Trends in Unmet Need for Physician and Preventive Services in the United States, 1998-2017.美国 1998-2017 年未满足的医师和预防服务需求趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Mar 1;180(3):439-448. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6538.