Gao Yu, Shi Lu, Smith Kelly C, Kingree Jeffery B, Thompson Martie
Division of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson Univistry, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 May 10;13(5):480. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050480.
The link between trait mindfulness and several dimensions of aggression (verbal, anger and hostility) has been documented, while the link between physical aggression and trait mindfulness remains less clear.
We used two datasets: one United States sample from 300 freshmen males from Clemson University, South Carolina and a Chinese sample of 1516 freshmen students from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. Multiple regressions were conducted to examine the association between mindfulness (measured by Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS)) and each of the four subscales of aggression.
Among the Clemson sample (N = 286), the mindfulness scale had a significant negative association with each of the four subscales of aggression: Hostility: β = -0.62, p < 0.001; Verbal: β = -0.37, p < 0.001; Physical: β = -0.29, p < 0.001; Anger: β = -0.44, p < 0.001. Among the Shanghai male subsample, the mindfulness scale had a significant negative association with each of the four subscales of aggression: Hostility: β = -0.57, p < 0.001; Verbal: β = -0.37, p < 0.001; Physical: β = -0.35, p < 0.001; Anger: β = -0.58, p < 0.001. Among the Shanghai female subsample (N = 512), the mindfulness scale had a significant negative association with each of the four subscales of aggression: Hostility: β = -0.62, p < 0.001; Verbal: β = -0.41, p < 0.001; Physical: β = -0.52, p < 0.001; and Anger: β = -0.64, p < 0.001.
Our study documents the negative association between mindfulness and physical aggression in two non-clinical samples. Future studies could explore whether mindfulness training lowers physical aggression among younger adults.
特质正念与攻击行为的几个维度(言语攻击、愤怒和敌意)之间的联系已有文献记载,而身体攻击与特质正念之间的联系仍不太明确。
我们使用了两个数据集:一个是来自南卡罗来纳州克莱姆森大学的300名大一男性的美国样本,另一个是来自上海财经大学的1516名大一学生的中国样本。进行了多元回归分析,以检验正念(用正念注意觉知量表(MAAS)测量)与攻击行为的四个子量表之间的关联。
在克莱姆森样本(N = 286)中,正念量表与攻击行为的四个子量表均呈显著负相关:敌意:β = -0.62,p < 0.001;言语攻击:β = -0.37,p < 0.001;身体攻击:β = -0.29,p < 0.001;愤怒:β = -0.44,p < 0.001。在上海男性子样本中,正念量表与攻击行为的四个子量表均呈显著负相关:敌意:β = -0.57,p < 0.001;言语攻击:β = -0.37,p < 0.001;身体攻击:β = -0.35,p < 0.001;愤怒:β = -0.58,p < 0.001。在上海女性子样本(N = 512)中,正念量表与攻击行为的四个子量表均呈显著负相关:敌意:β = -0.62,p < 0.001;言语攻击:β = -0.41,p < 0.001;身体攻击:β = -0.52,p < 0.001;愤怒:β = -0.64,p < 0.001。
我们的研究记录了两个非临床样本中正念与身体攻击之间的负相关。未来的研究可以探讨正念训练是否能降低年轻人中的身体攻击行为。