Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.
Phys Biol. 2016 May 11;13(3):035002. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/13/3/035002.
Using our own brains to study our brains is extraordinary. For example, in vision this makes us naturally blind to our own blindness, since our impression of seeing our world clearly is consistent with our ignorance of what we do not see. Our brain employs its 'conscious' part to reason and make logical deductions using familiar rules and past experience. However, human vision employs many 'subconscious' brain parts that follow rules alien to our intuition. Our blindness to our unknown unknowns and our presumptive intuitions easily lead us astray in asking and formulating theoretical questions, as witnessed in many unexpected and counter-intuitive difficulties and failures encountered by generations of scientists. We should therefore pay a more than usual amount of attention and respect to experimental data when studying our brain. I show that this can be productive by reviewing two vision theories that have provided testable predictions and surprising insights.
用我们自己的大脑来研究我们的大脑是非常特别的。例如,在视觉方面,这使我们自然而然地对自己的失明视而不见,因为我们清楚地看到我们世界的印象与我们不知道的东西是一致的。我们的大脑利用其“有意识”部分,根据熟悉的规则和过去的经验进行推理和逻辑推断。然而,人类的视觉使用了许多与我们的直觉不同的“潜意识”大脑部分。我们对未知的未知和假设的直觉的盲目性,很容易使我们在提出和制定理论问题时误入歧途,正如几代科学家在遇到许多意外和违反直觉的困难和失败中所看到的那样。因此,当我们研究大脑时,应该更加关注和尊重实验数据。我通过回顾两个提供了可测试预测和惊人见解的视觉理论来说明这一点是富有成效的。