Budischak Sarah A, Hoberg Eric P, Abrams Art, Jolles Anna E, Ezenwa Vanessa O
Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E. Green St, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 10300 Baltimore Ave, Bldg. 1180, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Sep;85(5):1222-33. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12548. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
Community assembly is a fundamental process that has long been a central focus in ecology. Extending community assembly theory to communities of co-infecting parasites, we used a gastrointestinal nematode removal experiment in free-ranging African buffalo to examine the community assembly patterns and processes. We first asked whether reassembled communities differ from undisturbed communities by comparing anthelmintic-treated and control hosts. Next, we examined the temporal dynamics of assembly using a cross-section of communities that reassembled for different periods of time since last experimental removal. Next, we tested for evidence of assembly processes that might drive such reassembly patterns: environmental filtering based on host traits (i.e. habitat patches), interspecific interactions, priority effects and chance dispersal from the environmental pool of infective stages (i.e. the regional species pool). On average, reassembled parasite communities had lower abundance, but were more diverse and even, and these patterns varied tightly with reassembly time. Over time, the communities within treated hosts progressively resembled controls as diversity and evenness decreased, while total abundance increased. Notably, experimental removal allowed us to attribute observed differences in abundance, diversity and evenness to the process of community assembly. During early reassembly, parasite accumulation was biased towards a subordinate species and, by excluding stochastic assembly processes (i.e. chance dispersal and priority effects), we were able to determine that early assembly is deterministic. Later in the reassembly process, we established that host traits, as well as stochastic dispersal from the environmental pool of infective stages, can affect the community composition. Overall, our results suggest that there is a high degree of resiliency and environmental dependence to the worm communities of buffalo. More generally, our data show that both deterministic and stochastic processes may play a role in the assembly of parasite communities of wild hosts, but their relative importance may vary temporally. Consequently, the best strategy for managing reassembling parasite communities may also need to shift over time.
群落构建是一个长期以来一直是生态学核心焦点的基本过程。将群落构建理论扩展到共感染寄生虫群落,我们在自由放养的非洲水牛中进行了一项胃肠道线虫清除实验,以研究群落构建模式和过程。我们首先通过比较驱虫治疗组和对照组宿主,来询问重新组装的群落是否与未受干扰的群落不同。接下来,我们使用自上次实验清除后重新组装不同时间段的群落横截面,研究了组装的时间动态。然后,我们测试了可能驱动这种重新组装模式的组装过程的证据:基于宿主特征(即栖息地斑块)的环境过滤、种间相互作用、优先效应以及来自感染阶段环境库(即区域物种库)的偶然扩散。平均而言,重新组装的寄生虫群落丰度较低,但更加多样且均匀,并且这些模式与重新组装时间紧密相关。随着时间的推移,治疗宿主内的群落逐渐与对照组相似,多样性和均匀度降低,而总丰度增加。值得注意的是,实验清除使我们能够将观察到的丰度、多样性和均匀度差异归因于群落构建过程。在早期重新组装期间,寄生虫积累偏向于一个从属物种,并且通过排除随机组装过程(即偶然扩散和优先效应),我们能够确定早期组装是确定性的。在重新组装过程的后期,我们确定宿主特征以及来自感染阶段环境库的随机扩散会影响群落组成。总体而言,我们的结果表明水牛的蠕虫群落具有高度的恢复力和环境依赖性。更一般地说,我们的数据表明确定性和随机过程都可能在野生宿主寄生虫群落的组装中起作用,但它们的相对重要性可能随时间变化。因此,管理重新组装的寄生虫群落的最佳策略可能也需要随着时间而改变。