Budischak Sarah A, Hoberg Eric P, Abrams Art, Jolles Anna E, Ezenwa Vanessa O
Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E. Green Street, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Bldg. 1180 BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 Sep;15(5):1112-9. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12382. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
Most hosts are concurrently or sequentially infected with multiple parasites; thus, fully understanding interactions between individual parasite species and their hosts depends on accurate characterization of the parasite community. For parasitic nematodes, noninvasive methods for obtaining quantitative, species-specific infection data in wildlife are often unreliable. Consequently, characterization of gastrointestinal nematode communities of wild hosts has largely relied on lethal sampling to isolate and enumerate adult worms directly from the tissues of dead hosts. The necessity of lethal sampling severely restricts the host species that can be studied, the adequacy of sample sizes to assess diversity, the geographic scope of collections and the research questions that can be addressed. Focusing on gastrointestinal nematodes of wild African buffalo, we evaluated whether accurate characterization of nematode communities could be made using a noninvasive technique that combined conventional parasitological approaches with molecular barcoding. To establish the reliability of this new method, we compared estimates of gastrointestinal nematode abundance, prevalence, richness and community composition derived from lethal sampling with estimates derived from our noninvasive approach. Our noninvasive technique accurately estimated total and species-specific worm abundances, as well as worm prevalence and community composition when compared to the lethal sampling method. Importantly, the rate of parasite species discovery was similar for both methods, and only a modest number of barcoded larvae (n = 10) were needed to capture key aspects of parasite community composition. Overall, this new noninvasive strategy offers numerous advantages over lethal sampling methods for studying nematode-host interactions in wildlife and can readily be applied to a range of study systems.
大多数宿主会同时或相继感染多种寄生虫;因此,要全面了解单个寄生虫物种与其宿主之间的相互作用,就依赖于对寄生虫群落的准确描述。对于寄生线虫而言,在野生动物中获取定量的、物种特异性感染数据的非侵入性方法往往不可靠。因此,对野生宿主胃肠道线虫群落的描述很大程度上依赖于致死性采样,以便直接从死亡宿主的组织中分离并计数成虫。致死性采样的必要性严重限制了可供研究的宿主物种、评估多样性所需的样本量充足性、采集的地理范围以及能够解决的研究问题。以野生非洲水牛的胃肠道线虫为研究对象,我们评估了结合传统寄生虫学方法与分子条形码技术的非侵入性技术能否准确描述线虫群落。为确定这种新方法的可靠性,我们将致死性采样得出的胃肠道线虫丰度、流行率、丰富度和群落组成估计值与我们的非侵入性方法得出的估计值进行了比较。与致死性采样方法相比,我们的非侵入性技术能够准确估计线虫的总数和物种特异性数量,以及线虫的流行率和群落组成。重要的是,两种方法发现寄生虫物种的速率相似,并且仅需少量经过条形码标记的幼虫(n = 10)就能获取寄生虫群落组成的关键信息。总体而言,这种新的非侵入性策略在研究野生动物中线虫与宿主的相互作用方面比致死性采样方法具有诸多优势,并且可以很容易地应用于一系列研究系统。