Pincetl Stephanie, Porse Erik, Cheng Deborah
California Center for Sustainable Communities, Institute of the Environment, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Social Science Research Council, New York, USA.
Environ Manage. 2016 Aug;58(2):208-22. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0707-1. Epub 2016 May 12.
In the Los Angeles metropolitan region, nearly 100 public and private entities are formally involved in the management and distribution of potable water-a legacy rooted in fragmented urban growth in the area and late 19th century convictions about local control of services. Yet, while policy debates focus on new forms of infrastructure, restructured pricing mechanisms, and other technical fixes, the complex institutional architecture of the present system has received little attention. In this paper, we trace the development of this system, describe its interconnections and disjunctures, and demonstrate the invisibility of water infrastructure in LA in multiple ways-through mapping, statistical analysis, and historical texts. Perverse blessings of past water abundance led to a complex, but less than resilient, system with users accustomed to cheap, easily accessible water. We describe the lack of transparency and accountability in the current system, as well as its shortcomings in building needed new infrastructure and instituting new water rate structures. Adapting to increasing water scarcity and likely droughts must include addressing the architecture of water management.
在洛杉矶大都市区,近100个公共和私人实体正式参与饮用水的管理和分配——这一传统源于该地区分散的城市发展以及19世纪后期对地方服务控制的信念。然而,尽管政策辩论聚焦于新型基础设施、重组定价机制及其他技术解决方案,但当前系统复杂的制度架构却很少受到关注。在本文中,我们追溯该系统的发展历程,描述其相互联系与脱节之处,并通过绘图、统计分析和历史文本等多种方式证明洛杉矶水基础设施的隐匿性。过去水资源丰富带来的不良影响导致了一个复杂但缺乏韧性的系统,用户习惯了廉价且易于获取的水。我们描述了当前系统缺乏透明度和问责制的情况,以及其在建设所需新基础设施和制定新水价结构方面的不足。适应日益严重的水资源短缺和可能出现的干旱必须包括解决水管理架构问题。