Thillai K, Repana D, Korantzis I, Kane P, Prachalias A, Ross P
Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1331-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
In patients with liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer, hepatic resection can offer a significant survival benefit over systemic therapy alone. Specialist hepatobiliary multidisciplinary meetings are currently believed to provide the best forum to discuss the management for these patients. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of patients diagnosed with liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer over 6 months within a cancer network in the United Kingdom. In addition, patients who were diagnosed but not referred to the hepatobiliary meeting were discussed within a virtual multi-disciplinary setting. Contributors were blinded and proposed management recorded. 159 newly diagnosed patients with liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer were identified. 68 (43%) were referred at initial diagnosis and 38 (24%) referred following systemic treatment. 35 (51%) who were discussed at baseline underwent a subsequent hepatectomy or radiofrequency ablation, as did 18 (47%) patients referred after chemotherapy. Of the remaining 53 (33%) patients not referred, imaging was available for 31 (58%). Decisions regarding potential liver-directed therapy were discussed within a multi-disciplinary setting. 13 (42%) were identified as resectable or potentially resectable and 11 (36%) may have been suitable for a clinical trial. In reality, none of these 31 patients (100%) underwent surgery or ablation. Whilst the majority of patients with liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer were referred appropriately, this study demonstrates that a significant number with potentially resectable disease are not being discussed at specialist meetings. A review of all diagnosed cases would ensure that an increased number of patients are offered hepatic resection or ablation.
对于肝转移局限的结直肠癌患者,肝切除相较于单纯的全身治疗可带来显著的生存获益。目前认为,专科肝胆多学科会议是讨论这些患者治疗方案的最佳平台。对英国一个癌症网络内6个月内确诊为肝转移局限的结直肠癌患者进行了回顾性分析。此外,对那些已确诊但未被转诊至肝胆会议的患者,在虚拟多学科环境中进行了讨论。参与者信息保密,并记录提出的治疗方案。共识别出159例新确诊的肝转移局限的结直肠癌患者。68例(43%)在初诊时被转诊,38例(24%)在接受全身治疗后被转诊。35例(51%)在基线讨论时接受了后续肝切除或射频消融,化疗后转诊的18例患者(47%)也接受了同样治疗。其余53例(33%)未被转诊的患者中,31例(58%)有影像学资料。在多学科环境中讨论了关于潜在肝靶向治疗的决策。13例(42%)被确定为可切除或潜在可切除,11例(36%)可能适合临床试验。实际上,这31例患者中无一例(100%)接受手术或消融治疗。虽然大多数肝转移局限的结直肠癌患者得到了适当转诊,但本研究表明,相当数量的潜在可切除患者未在专科会议上得到讨论。对所有确诊病例进行审查将确保更多患者能够接受肝切除或消融治疗。