• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当地多学科团队与专科多学科团队之间的密切合作,使得结直肠癌肝转移患者能够得到“快速诊治”。

Close collaboration between local and specialist multidisciplinary teams allows 'fast-tracking' of patients with colorectal liver metastases.

作者信息

Vasudevan S P, Cresswell A B, Wright J M, Rees M, Stiff D, Wordley A, Motson R W

机构信息

The ICENI Centre, Colchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(10):1253-6. doi: 10.1111/codi.12323.

DOI:10.1111/codi.12323
PMID:23790093
Abstract

AIM

The ongoing evolution of treatment strategies for colorectal liver metastases necessarily requires all patients to be reviewed at some point by the specialist hepatobiliary unit. This process can be streamlined through close collaboration with the local colorectal multidisciplinary team (MDT). The study was performed to see if a local colorectal MDT was able to make a correct decision regarding potential operability of liver metastases, by comparing its decision with that of two hepatobiliary surgeons in our referral centre.

METHOD

CT scans of 38 patients found to have liver metastases from colorectal cancer were anonymized and sent to two hepatobiliary surgeons in our cancer network. They classified them into three categories: R, resectable; C, chemotherapy to downsize then consider resection; U, unresectable. The results were then compared with the opinion of our colorectal MDT, made before the referral to the hepatobiliary surgeons.

RESULTS

The two independent hepatobiliary surgeons agreed with each other on 35/38 (92%) of CT scans. Our colorectal MDT agreed with the hepatobiliary surgeons in 36/38 (95%) of cases. Only 9 (32%) of the 28 patients deemed suitable on the CT scan by the hepatobiliary surgeons actually had a liver resection.

CONCLUSION

The results show that a local colorectal MDT is able to make an accurate assessment of the operability of liver metastases. Patients deemed to be inoperable by the colorectal MDT could be 'fast-tracked' to the hepatobiliary MDT with review of imaging only, saving time and resources by avoiding referral of patients who are not suitable for liver resection.

摘要

目的

结直肠癌肝转移治疗策略的不断演变必然要求所有患者在某个时间点由肝胆专科单位进行评估。通过与当地结直肠癌多学科团队(MDT)密切合作,这一过程可以得到简化。本研究旨在通过将当地结直肠癌MDT的决策与我们转诊中心的两位肝胆外科医生的决策进行比较,来观察当地结直肠癌MDT是否能够对肝转移的潜在可切除性做出正确决策。

方法

对38例被发现有结直肠癌肝转移的患者的CT扫描进行匿名处理,并发送给我们癌症网络中的两位肝胆外科医生。他们将这些病例分为三类:R,可切除;C,先进行化疗缩小肿瘤大小然后考虑切除;U,不可切除。然后将结果与我们结直肠癌MDT在转诊给肝胆外科医生之前的意见进行比较。

结果

两位独立的肝胆外科医生在38例CT扫描中的35例(92%)上意见一致。我们的结直肠癌MDT在38例病例中的36例(95%)上与肝胆外科医生意见一致。在肝胆外科医生通过CT扫描判定适合手术的28例患者中,只有9例(32%)实际进行了肝切除。

结论

结果表明,当地结直肠癌MDT能够对肝转移的可切除性做出准确评估。被结直肠癌MDT判定为不可手术的患者可以仅通过影像检查被“快速转诊”至肝胆MDT,通过避免转诊不适合肝切除的患者来节省时间和资源。

相似文献

1
Close collaboration between local and specialist multidisciplinary teams allows 'fast-tracking' of patients with colorectal liver metastases.当地多学科团队与专科多学科团队之间的密切合作,使得结直肠癌肝转移患者能够得到“快速诊治”。
Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(10):1253-6. doi: 10.1111/codi.12323.
2
The Impact of a Hepatobiliary Multidisciplinary Team Assessment in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Population-Based Study.肝胆多学科团队评估对结直肠癌肝转移患者的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Oncologist. 2017 Sep;22(9):1067-1074. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0028. Epub 2017 May 26.
3
Effect of specialist decision-making on treatment strategies for colorectal liver metastases.专家决策对结直肠癌肝转移治疗策略的影响。
Br J Surg. 2012 Sep;99(9):1263-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8835.
4
Clinical outcomes for patients with liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer: Arguing the case for specialist hepatobiliary multidisciplinary assessment.肝局限性转移性结直肠癌患者的临床结局:支持专科肝胆多学科评估的理由
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1331-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
A 10-year study of outcome following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases - The effect of evaluation in a multidisciplinary team setting.结直肠癌肝转移肝切除术后结局的10年研究——多学科团队评估的影响
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar;35(3):302-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.028. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
6
The Oncosurge strategy for the management of colorectal liver metastases - an external validation study.用于结直肠癌肝转移管理的Oncosurge策略——一项外部验证研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 May;34(5):538-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
7
[Diagnosis and treatment of colorectal liver metastases - workflow].[结直肠癌肝转移的诊断与治疗——工作流程]
Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Jun;133(3):267-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1076796.
8
Imaging and treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases in the Netherlands: a survey.荷兰结直肠癌肝转移患者的影像学检查与治疗:一项调查
Neth J Med. 2006 May;64(5):147-51.
9
Variation in referral practice for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases.结直肠癌肝转移患者转诊实践的差异。
Br J Surg. 2013 Nov;100(12):1627-32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9285.
10
[Hepatic resection after neoadjuvant therapy for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases].新辅助治疗后对初始不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移灶进行肝切除术
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009 Dec;36(13):2579-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Standard Treatment for Stage 4 Colorectal Cancer: Traditional Management with Surgery, Radiation, and Chemotherapy.四期结直肠癌标准治疗的有效性:手术、放疗和化疗的传统管理方法
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Mar 15;37(2):62-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761420. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison.结直肠多学科团队会议的系统评价:国际比较。
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab044.
3
Outcome of indeterminate liver lesions on computed tomography in patients with colorectal cancer.
结直肠癌患者肝脏CT检查中不确定病变的结果
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 May;100(5):382-387. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0070. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Centralization of Liver Cancer Surgery and Impact on Multidisciplinary Teams Working on Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.肝癌手术的集中化及其对从事IV期结直肠癌治疗的多学科团队的影响。
Oncol Rev. 2017 Jul 31;11(2):331. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2017.331. eCollection 2017 Jun 14.