Ng Pauline Yeung, Sin Wai Ching, Ng Andrew Kei-Yan, Chan Wai Ming
Department of Adult Intensive Care, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China.
Cardiac Medical Unit, Grantham Hospital, 125 Wong Chuk Hang Road, Hong Kong, China.
Crit Care. 2016 May 14;20(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1327-0.
Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction is a well-recognized condition and confers worse outcomes in septic patients. Echocardiographic assessment by conventional parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is often affected by ongoing changes in preload and afterload conditions. Novel echocardiographic technologies such as speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) have evolved for direct assessment of the myocardial function. We investigate the measurement of myocardial strain by speckle tracking echocardiography for the diagnosis of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction.
This is a case-control study at a university-affiliated medical intensive care unit. Consecutive adult medical patients admitted with a diagnosis of septic shock were included. Patients with other causes of myocardial dysfunction were excluded. They were compared to age-matched, gender-matched, and cardiovascular risk-factor-matched controls, who were admitted to hospital for sepsis but did not develop septic shock. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed on all patients within 24 hours of diagnosis, and a reassessment echocardiogram was performed in the study group of patients upon recovery.
Patients with septic shock (n = 33) (study group) and 29 matched patients with sepsis but no septic shock (control group) were recruited. The mean sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score for the study and control groups were 10.2 and 1.6, respectively (P < 0.001). In patients with septic shock, the mean arterial pressure was lower (76 mmHg vs 82 mmHg, P = 0.032), and the heart rate was higher (99 bpm vs 86 bpm, P = 0.008). The cardiac output (5.9 L/min vs 5.5 L/min, P = 0.401) and systemic vascular resistance (1090 dynes•sec/cm(5) vs 1194 dynes•sec/cm(5), P = 0.303) were similar. The study group had a greater degree of myocardial dysfunction measured by global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-14.5 % vs -18.3 %, P <0.001), and the myocardial strain differed upon diagnosis and recovery (-14.5 % vs -16.0 %, P = 0.010). Conventional echocardiographic measurements such as LVEF (59 % in the study group vs 61 % in the control group, P = 0.169) did not differ between the two groups.
Speckle tracking echocardiography can detect significant left ventricular impairment in patients with septic shock, which was not otherwise detectable by conventional echocardiography. The reversible nature of myocardial dysfunction in sepsis was also demonstrable. This echocardiographic technique is useful in the diagnosis and monitoring of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction.
脓毒症诱发的心肌功能障碍是一种公认的病症,会使脓毒症患者的预后更差。通过诸如左心室射血分数(LVEF)等传统参数进行的超声心动图评估常常受到前负荷和后负荷状况持续变化的影响。诸如斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)等新型超声心动图技术已发展用于直接评估心肌功能。我们研究通过斑点追踪超声心动图测量心肌应变以诊断脓毒症诱发的心肌功能障碍。
这是一项在大学附属医院重症监护病房开展的病例对照研究。纳入连续收治的诊断为脓毒性休克的成年内科患者。排除其他原因导致心肌功能障碍的患者。将他们与年龄匹配、性别匹配且心血管危险因素匹配的对照组进行比较,对照组因脓毒症入院但未发生脓毒性休克。所有患者在诊断后24小时内进行经胸超声心动图检查,研究组患者康复后进行复查超声心动图检查。
招募了脓毒性休克患者(n = 33)(研究组)和29名匹配的脓毒症但无脓毒性休克患者(对照组)。研究组和对照组的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)平均评分分别为10.2和1.6(P < 0.001)。脓毒性休克患者的平均动脉压较低(76 mmHg对82 mmHg,P = 0.032),心率较高(99次/分钟对86次/分钟,P = 0.008)。心输出量(5.9 L/分钟对5.5 L/分钟,P = 0.401)和全身血管阻力(1090达因·秒/厘米⁵对1194达因·秒/厘米⁵,P = 0.303)相似。通过整体纵向应变(GLS)测量,研究组的心肌功能障碍程度更大(-14.5%对-18.3%,P <0.001),且诊断时和康复时的心肌应变有所不同(-14.5%对-16.0%,P = 0.010)。两组之间诸如LVEF等传统超声心动图测量值(研究组为59%,对照组为61%,P = 0.169)没有差异。
斑点追踪超声心动图可检测出脓毒性休克患者存在明显的左心室损害,而传统超声心动图无法检测到。脓毒症中心肌功能障碍的可逆性也得到了证实。这种超声心动图技术在诊断和监测脓毒症诱发的心肌功能障碍方面很有用。