Cagimni Pınar, Govsa Figen, Ozer Mehmet Asim, Kazak Zuhal
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, 35100, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2017 Feb;39(2):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s00276-016-1691-0. Epub 2016 May 13.
Investigation of the computerized dimensional anatomic location of the greater palatine foramen (GPF) and lesser palatine foramens (LPF) is important indicating site to collect palatal donor tissue, reconstructioning the orofacial area of the oncology patient and applying the greater palatine nerve block anesthesia. The aim of this study is to determine a patient-friendly landmark and to specify the precise location of the GPF in order to standardise certain anatomical marks of safe neurovascular bundle.
120 bony palates were examined to detect the position of the GPF and the LPF related to adjacent anatomical landmarks using a computer software program. The GPF was assessed regarding the position, the diameter and the distances between each foramen and the midline maxillary suture (MMS), the inner border of alveolar ridge (AR), posterior palatal border (PBB), and incisive foramen (IF).
The GPF was identified as single in 81 %, double in 16 %, triple in 2 % and absent in 2 % of the specimens. The mean distances between the GPF and the MSS, the GPF and the AR, the GPF and the PPB, the GPF and the IF were 16, 4, 4, and 40 mm, respectively. In majority of the cases, the GPF was seen between the distal surfaces of the third maxillary molar (78 %). Single LPF was observed in 53.45 % of the skulls, two LPF were observed in 31 % of the skulls bilaterally and five LPF were rare in 2.1 % of the specimens. The LPF was most commonly at the junction of the palatine bone and the inner lamella of the pterygoid plate (71.9 %).
This study made possible to investigate the variability of the GPF and the feasibility of the greater palatine neurovascular bundle, and to calculate the lengths of some parameters with the help of certain software. To collect the donor tissue of the neurovascular greater palatine network, each distance among the AR-GPF-PPB were equal to 4 mm. To estimate the possible length of the graft, the incision was made along the third and the second molar to the IF as 4 cm. The data we obtained within this study have been presented to help the surgeons avoid unexpected hemorrhage during the palatinal procedures such as posttraumatic dental reconstruction, maxillofacial tumor resections, palatal micro-implants, and dentofacial orthopedic surgery.
研究腭大孔(GPF)和腭小孔(LPF)的计算机化三维解剖位置对于采集腭部供体组织、重建肿瘤患者的口面部区域以及应用腭大神经阻滞麻醉具有重要意义。本研究的目的是确定一个对患者友好的标志,并明确腭大孔的精确位置,以便规范安全神经血管束的某些解剖标志。
使用计算机软件程序检查120块腭骨,以检测腭大孔和腭小孔与相邻解剖标志的位置关系。评估腭大孔的位置、直径以及每个孔与上颌中线缝(MMS)、牙槽嵴内缘(AR)、腭后缘(PBB)和切牙孔(IF)之间的距离。
在81%的标本中,腭大孔为单个;16%为双个;2%为三个;2%未发现。腭大孔与上颌中线缝、腭大孔与牙槽嵴、腭大孔与腭后缘、腭大孔与切牙孔之间的平均距离分别为16、4、4和40毫米。在大多数情况下,腭大孔位于上颌第三磨牙远中面之间(78%)。在53.45%的颅骨中观察到单个腭小孔,在31%的颅骨双侧观察到两个腭小孔,在2.1%的标本中罕见五个腭小孔。腭小孔最常见于腭骨与翼突板内层的交界处(71.9%)。
本研究使得研究腭大孔的变异性和腭大神经血管束的可行性成为可能,并借助特定软件计算一些参数的长度。为采集腭大神经血管网络的供体组织,牙槽嵴 - 腭大孔 - 腭后缘之间的每个距离均等于4毫米。为估计移植物的可能长度,沿第三和第二磨牙至切牙孔做4厘米的切口。我们在本研究中获得的数据有助于外科医生在诸如创伤后牙齿重建、颌面肿瘤切除、腭部微型植入物以及牙颌面正畸手术等腭部手术中避免意外出血。