Ahangari Hamed, Atkinson-Palombo Carol, Garrick Norman W
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Road, Unit 3037, Storrs, CT 06268, United States.
Department of Geography, University of Connecticut, 215 Glenbrook Road, U-4148, Storrs, CT 06268, United States.
J Safety Res. 2016 Jun;57:61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
In January 2015, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) announced that the official target of the federal government transportation safety policy was zero deaths. Having a better understanding of traffic fatality trends of various age cohorts-and to what extent the US is lagging other countries-is a crucial first step to identifying policies that may help the USDOT achieve its goal.
In this paper we analyze fatality rates for different age cohorts in developed countries to better understand how road traffic fatality patterns vary across countries by age cohort. Using benchmarking analysis and comparative index analysis based on panel data modelling and data for selected years between 1990 and 2010, we compare changes in the rate of road traffic fatality over time, as well as the absolute level of road traffic fatality for six age groups in the US, with 15 other developed countries.
RESULTS-CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate tremendous variations in road fatality rates (both in terms of the absolute values and the rates of improvement over time) among different age cohorts in all of the 16 countries. Looking specifically at the US, our analysis shows that safety improvements for Youngsters (15-17 years old) was much better than for other age groups, and closely tracked peer countries. In sharp contrast, Children (0-14 years old) and Seniors (+65 years old) in the US, fare very poorly when compared to peer countries. For example, in 2010, Children in the US were a stunning five times more likely to experience a road traffic fatality than Children in the UK.
This startling statistic suggests an immediate need to explore further the causes and potential solutions to these disparities. This is especially important if countries, including the US, are to achieve the ambitious goals set out in Zero Vision initiatives.
2015年1月,美国运输部(USDOT)宣布联邦政府运输安全政策的官方目标是零死亡。更好地了解不同年龄组的交通死亡趋势,以及美国在多大程度上落后于其他国家,是确定可能有助于美国运输部实现其目标的政策的关键第一步。
在本文中,我们分析了发达国家不同年龄组的死亡率,以更好地了解道路交通死亡模式如何因年龄组而异。使用基于面板数据建模和1990年至2010年选定年份数据的基准分析和比较指数分析,我们比较了美国六个年龄组与其他15个发达国家道路交通死亡率随时间的变化以及道路交通死亡的绝对水平。
结果-结论:我们的研究结果表明,所有16个国家不同年龄组的道路死亡率(无论是绝对值还是随时间的改善率)都存在巨大差异。具体来看美国,我们的分析表明,青少年(15 - 17岁)的安全改善情况比其他年龄组要好得多,并且与同类型国家密切跟踪。形成鲜明对比的是,美国的儿童(0 - 14岁)和老年人(65岁以上)与同类型国家相比情况非常糟糕。例如,2010年,美国儿童遭遇道路交通死亡的可能性比英国儿童高出惊人的五倍。
这一惊人的统计数据表明,迫切需要进一步探究这些差异的原因和潜在解决方案。如果包括美国在内的各国要实现零愿景倡议中设定的宏伟目标,这一点尤为重要。