新发生的血液透析滤过和高通量血液透析患者的红细胞生成刺激剂抵抗指数的动力学。

Dynamics of the erythropoiesis stimulating agent resistance index in incident hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis patients.

机构信息

Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany.

Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 2016 Jul;90(1):192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 May 10.

Abstract

Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy in dialysis patients is poorly understood. Some studies report an improvement in the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent resistance index (ERI) with hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus high-flux hemodialysis (HD). We explored ERI dynamics in 38,340 incident HDF and HD patients treated in 22 countries over a 7-year period. Groups were matched by propensity score at baseline (6 months after dialysis initiation). The follow-up period (mean of 1.31 years) was stratified into 1 month intervals with delta analyses performed for key ERI-related parameters. Dialysis modality, time interval, and polycystic kidney disease were included in a linear mixed model with the outcome ERI. Baseline ERI was nonsignificantly higher in HDF versus HD treatment. ERI decreased significantly faster in HDF-treated patients than in HD-treated patients, was decreased in both HD and HDF when patients were treated with intravenous darbepoetin alfa, but only in HDF when treated with intravenous recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). A clear difference between HD- and HDF-treated patients could only be found for patients with high baseline ERI and assigned to intravenous rHuEPO treatment. A significant advantage in terms of lower ERI for patients treated by HDF was found. Sensitivity analysis limited this advantage for HDF to those patients treated with intravenous rHuEPO (not darbepoetin alfa or subcutaneous rHuEPO) and to patients with a high baseline ERI. Thus, our results allow more accurate planning for future clinical trials addressing anemia management in dialysis patients.

摘要

透析患者对促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗反应低下的机制尚不清楚。一些研究报告称,与高通量血液透析(HD)相比,血液透析滤过(HDF)可改善促红细胞生成素刺激剂抵抗指数(ERI)。我们在 22 个国家的 38340 例新接受 HDF 和 HD 治疗的患者中探讨了 ERI 的动态变化。在开始透析后 6 个月时,通过倾向评分匹配基线(6 个月时)对两组进行匹配。在 7 年的随访期间(平均随访 1.31 年),按 1 个月间隔分层,并对关键 ERI 相关参数进行差值分析。在包含透析方式、时间间隔和多囊肾病的线性混合模型中,ERI 是因变量。与 HD 治疗相比,HDF 治疗的基线 ERI 无显著升高。与 HD 治疗相比,HDF 治疗患者的 ERI 下降速度明显更快,静脉注射达贝泊汀α和静脉注射重组人红细胞生成素(rHuEPO)治疗时 HD 和 HDF 的 ERI 均下降,但仅在静脉注射 rHuEPO 治疗时 HDF 的 ERI 下降。只有基线 ERI 较高且接受静脉注射 rHuEPO 治疗的患者才能在 HD 和 HDF 治疗患者之间发现明显差异。接受 HDF 治疗的患者 ERI 较低,具有显著优势。敏感性分析将 HDF 的这一优势仅限于接受静脉注射 rHuEPO(而非达贝泊汀α或皮下注射 rHuEPO)和基线 ERI 较高的患者。因此,我们的结果为未来针对透析患者贫血管理的临床试验提供了更准确的计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索