Suppr超能文献

使用天然心脏负荷控制系统,通过增加旋转式左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的转速变化来改变搏动性。

Shifting the pulsatility by increasing the change in rotational speed for a rotary LVAD using a native heart load control system.

作者信息

Date Kazuma, Nishimura Takashi, Takewa Yoshiaki, Kishimoto Satoru, Arakawa Mamoru, Umeki Akihide, Ando Masahiko, Mizuno Toshihide, Tsukiya Tomonori, Ono Minoru, Tatsumi Eisuke

机构信息

Department of Artificial Organs, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, 5-7-1 Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka, 565-8565, Japan.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.

出版信息

J Artif Organs. 2016 Dec;19(4):315-321. doi: 10.1007/s10047-016-0906-9. Epub 2016 May 14.

Abstract

We have previously developed a native heart load control system for a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) ((EVAHEART; Sun Medical) and demonstrated that the rotational speed (RS) in synchronization with the cardiac cycle can alter pulsatility and left ventricular (LV) load under general anesthesia. In this study, we assessed the effects of different levels of increase in RS on pulsatility and LV load in the chronic awake phase. We implanted the EVAHEART via left thoracotomy in 7 normal goats (59.3 ± 4.6 kg). Two weeks after implantation, we examined the effects of co-pulse mode (increased RS in the systolic phase) and counter-pulse mode (increased RS in the diastolic phase), as well as shifting the change in RS from 250 to 500 rpm, and 750 rpm in both modes on pulsatility and LV load. Pulsatility was assessed using pulse pressure and mean dP/dt max of aortic pressure. LV load was assessed using stroke work and left ventricle end-diastolic volume determined from LV pressure-volume loops. In the co-pulse mode, pulsatility values increased as the change in RS increased. By contrast, in the counter-pulse mode, these values decreased as the change in RS increased. LV load increased significantly in the co-pulse mode compared with the counter-pulse mode, but there were no significant differences among the three levels of RS increase in either mode. Increasing RS to varying degrees with our newly developed system could contribute to pulsatility. However, it appeared to have little effect on LV load in normal hearts.

摘要

我们之前为连续流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)(EVAHEART;太阳医疗公司)开发了一种原生心脏负荷控制系统,并证明在全身麻醉下,与心动周期同步的转速(RS)可以改变搏动性和左心室(LV)负荷。在本研究中,我们评估了在慢性清醒期不同程度增加RS对搏动性和LV负荷的影响。我们通过左胸切开术将EVAHEART植入7只正常山羊(体重59.3±4.6千克)体内。植入两周后,我们研究了共搏模式(收缩期增加RS)和反搏模式(舒张期增加RS)的影响,以及在两种模式下将RS的变化从250转/分改变到500转/分和750转/分对搏动性和LV负荷的影响。使用脉压和主动脉压力的平均dP/dt max评估搏动性。使用搏功和根据LV压力-容积环确定的左心室舒张末期容积评估LV负荷。在共搏模式下,搏动性值随着RS变化的增加而增加。相比之下,在反搏模式下,这些值随着RS变化的增加而降低。与反搏模式相比,共搏模式下LV负荷显著增加,但在两种模式中,RS增加的三个水平之间均无显著差异。使用我们新开发的系统不同程度地增加RS可有助于搏动性。然而,它似乎对正常心脏的LV负荷影响不大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验