Liu Gang, Su Yingying, Jiang Mengdi, Chen Weibi, Zhang Yan, Zhang Yunzhou, Gao Daiquan
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Neurosci Lett. 2016 Jul 28;626:74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.04.055. Epub 2016 May 13.
Electroencephalogram reactivity (EEG-R) is a positive predictive factor for assessing outcomes in comatose patients. Most studies assess the prognostic value of EEG-R utilizing visual analysis; however, this method is prone to subjectivity. We sought to categorize EEG-R with a quantitative approach. We retrospectively studied consecutive comatose patients who had an EEG-R recording performed 1-3 days after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or during normothermia after therapeutic hypothermia. EEG-R was assessed via visual analysis and quantitative analysis separately. Clinical outcomes were followed-up at 3-month and dichotomized as recovery of awareness or no recovery of awareness. A total of 96 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 38 (40%) patients recovered awareness at 3-month followed-up. Of 27 patients with EEG-R measured with visual analysis, 22 patients recovered awareness; and of the 69 patients who did not demonstrated EEG-R, 16 patients recovered awareness. The sensitivity and specificity of visually measured EEG-R were 58% and 91%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the quantitative analysis was 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.97), with the best cut-off value of 0.10. EEG-R through quantitative analysis might be a good method in predicting the recovery of awareness in patients with post-anoxic coma after CPR.
脑电图反应性(EEG-R)是评估昏迷患者预后的一个阳性预测因素。大多数研究利用视觉分析来评估EEG-R的预后价值;然而,这种方法容易受到主观因素影响。我们试图用定量方法对EEG-R进行分类。我们回顾性研究了连续的昏迷患者,这些患者在心肺复苏(CPR)后1-3天或治疗性低温后的常温期间进行了EEG-R记录。分别通过视觉分析和定量分析来评估EEG-R。在3个月时对临床结局进行随访,并将其分为意识恢复或未恢复。共有96例患者符合纳入标准,38例(40%)患者在3个月随访时意识恢复。在通过视觉分析测量EEG-R的27例患者中,22例患者意识恢复;在未表现出EEG-R的69例患者中,16例患者意识恢复。视觉测量的EEG-R的敏感性和特异性分别为58%和91%。定量分析的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.92(95%置信区间,0.87-0.97),最佳截断值为0.10。通过定量分析的EEG-R可能是预测CPR后缺氧后昏迷患者意识恢复的一种好方法。