Cervetti Louise, Vallard Alexis, Le Moulec Sylvestre, Espenel Sophie, Falk Alexander Tuan, Ben Mrad Majed, Guy Jean-Baptiste, Diao Peng, Méry Benoîte, Langrand-Escure Julien, Ferrand François-Régis, Rivoirard Romain, Ceccaldi Bernard, Védrine Lionel, Magné Nicolas, Chargari Cyrus
Hôpital d'instruction des armées du Val-de-Grâce, service d'oncologie et radiothérapie, boulevard du Port-Royal, 75013 Paris, France.
Institut de cancérologie Lucien-Neuwirth, département de radiothérapie, 108 bis, avenue Albert-Raimond, BP 60008, 42271 Saint-Priest-en-Jarez cedex, France.
Bull Cancer. 2016 Jun;103(6):561-70. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 May 12.
The score of the MASCC, by means of clinical criteria, estimates the risk of serious complications in patients with neutropenic fever induced by chemotherapy.
We retrospectively studied a cohort of patients hospitalized for a neutropenic fever and analyzed complications according to the criteria defined by the MASCC.
Eighty-one neutropenic fevers in 71 patients were identified. Microbiological documentation was obtained in 33% of cases only. Fifty-eight patients (72%) presented with a MASCC score≥21 and were considered as low risk of complications. In the total population, 10 patients died during their hospitalizations for neutropenic fever, 7 in the high-risk group versus 3 in the low risk group, including 2 patients suffering from significant comorbidities not taken into account by MASCC score. Within the low risk group, presence of a metastatic disease and existence of 2 or more comorbidities were associated with a longer duration of hospitalization.
This analysis suggests that the criteria of the MASCC are not always enough to thoroughly identify which patients were at risk of complications or could be treated through outpatient management. By better taking into account the comorbidities and tumoral stage, a better selection of the patients who are likely to receive an ambulatory treatment could be made. To date, hospitalization remains frequently necessary in neutropenic fevers, at least in its initial steps, and the place of the general practitioner remains to be better defined.
通过临床标准计算的MASCC评分可评估化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少性发热患者发生严重并发症的风险。
我们回顾性研究了一组因中性粒细胞减少性发热住院的患者,并根据MASCC定义的标准分析并发症。
共识别出71例患者的81次中性粒细胞减少性发热。仅33%的病例获得了微生物学证据。58例患者(72%)的MASCC评分≥21,被认为并发症风险低。在总体人群中,10例患者在因中性粒细胞减少性发热住院期间死亡,高危组7例,低危组3例,其中2例患者患有MASCC评分未考虑的严重合并症。在低危组中,存在转移性疾病和两种或更多合并症与住院时间延长相关。
该分析表明,MASCC标准并不总是足以全面识别哪些患者有并发症风险或可通过门诊治疗。通过更好地考虑合并症和肿瘤分期,可以更好地选择可能接受门诊治疗的患者。迄今为止,中性粒细胞减少性发热患者通常仍需住院,至少在初始阶段如此,全科医生的作用仍有待更好地界定。