Gonzalez Victor, Rowson Jennifer, Yoxall Alaster
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Insigneo Institute for In Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Insigneo Institute for In Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
J Hand Ther. 2017 Jan-Mar;30(1):80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 13.
Bench and cross-sectional study.
Information obtained from dexterity tests is an important component of a comprehensive examination of the hand.
To analyze and compare finger interdependencies during the performance of the Purdue Pegboard Test (PBT) and comparative daily tasks.
A method based on the optoelectronic kinematic analysis of the precision grip style and on the calculation of cross-correlation coefficients between relevant joint angles, which provided measures of the degree of finger coordination, was conducted on 10 healthy participants performing the PBT and 2 comparative daily living tasks.
Daily tasks showed identifiable interdependencies patterns between the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers involved in the grip. Tasks related to activities of daily living resulted in significantly higher cross-correlation coefficients across subjects and movements during the formation and manipulation phases of the tasks (0.7-0.9), whereas the release stage produced significantly lower movement correlation values (0.3-0.7). Contrarily, the formation and manipulation stages of the PBT showed low finger correlation across most subjects (0.2-0.6), whereas the release stage resulted in the highest values for all relevant movements (0.65-0.9).
Interdependencies patterns were consistent for the activities of daily living but differ from the patterns observed from the PBT.
The PBT does not compare well with the whole range of finger movements that account for hand performance during daily tasks.
Not applicable.
实验台研究和横断面研究。
从灵活性测试中获得的信息是手部综合检查的重要组成部分。
分析和比较在普渡钉板测试(PBT)和日常对照任务执行过程中的手指相互依存关系。
对10名健康参与者进行PBT和2项日常对照任务,采用基于光电运动学分析精确抓握方式以及计算相关关节角度之间互相关系数的方法,该系数可衡量手指协调程度。
日常任务显示,参与抓握的手指掌指关节之间存在可识别的相互依存模式。与日常生活活动相关的任务在任务形成和操作阶段,受试者和动作的互相关系数显著更高(0.7 - 0.9),而释放阶段的动作相关值显著更低(0.3 - 0.7)。相反,PBT的形成和操作阶段在大多数受试者中显示出较低的手指相关性(0.2 - 0.6),而释放阶段所有相关动作的值最高(0.65 - 0.9)。
日常生活活动的相互依存模式是一致的,但与PBT中观察到的模式不同。
PBT与日常任务中手部表现所涉及的整个手指运动范围相比效果不佳。
不适用。