Suppr超能文献

分析普渡钉板测试期间手指的相互依存关系以及日常生活中的对比活动。

Analyzing finger interdependencies during the Purdue Pegboard Test and comparative activities of daily living.

作者信息

Gonzalez Victor, Rowson Jennifer, Yoxall Alaster

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Insigneo Institute for In Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Insigneo Institute for In Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Hand Ther. 2017 Jan-Mar;30(1):80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 13.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Bench and cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION

Information obtained from dexterity tests is an important component of a comprehensive examination of the hand.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To analyze and compare finger interdependencies during the performance of the Purdue Pegboard Test (PBT) and comparative daily tasks.

METHODS

A method based on the optoelectronic kinematic analysis of the precision grip style and on the calculation of cross-correlation coefficients between relevant joint angles, which provided measures of the degree of finger coordination, was conducted on 10 healthy participants performing the PBT and 2 comparative daily living tasks.

RESULTS

Daily tasks showed identifiable interdependencies patterns between the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers involved in the grip. Tasks related to activities of daily living resulted in significantly higher cross-correlation coefficients across subjects and movements during the formation and manipulation phases of the tasks (0.7-0.9), whereas the release stage produced significantly lower movement correlation values (0.3-0.7). Contrarily, the formation and manipulation stages of the PBT showed low finger correlation across most subjects (0.2-0.6), whereas the release stage resulted in the highest values for all relevant movements (0.65-0.9).

DISCUSSION

Interdependencies patterns were consistent for the activities of daily living but differ from the patterns observed from the PBT.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBT does not compare well with the whole range of finger movements that account for hand performance during daily tasks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Not applicable.

摘要

研究设计

实验台研究和横断面研究。

引言

从灵活性测试中获得的信息是手部综合检查的重要组成部分。

研究目的

分析和比较在普渡钉板测试(PBT)和日常对照任务执行过程中的手指相互依存关系。

方法

对10名健康参与者进行PBT和2项日常对照任务,采用基于光电运动学分析精确抓握方式以及计算相关关节角度之间互相关系数的方法,该系数可衡量手指协调程度。

结果

日常任务显示,参与抓握的手指掌指关节之间存在可识别的相互依存模式。与日常生活活动相关的任务在任务形成和操作阶段,受试者和动作的互相关系数显著更高(0.7 - 0.9),而释放阶段的动作相关值显著更低(0.3 - 0.7)。相反,PBT的形成和操作阶段在大多数受试者中显示出较低的手指相关性(0.2 - 0.6),而释放阶段所有相关动作的值最高(0.65 - 0.9)。

讨论

日常生活活动的相互依存模式是一致的,但与PBT中观察到的模式不同。

结论

PBT与日常任务中手部表现所涉及的整个手指运动范围相比效果不佳。

证据水平

不适用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验