Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catholic University, Curitiba, Brazil.
Global Spine J. 2016 Jun;6(4):329-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563610. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
Study Design Survey of 100 worldwide spine surgeons. Objective To develop a spine injury score for the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System. Methods Each respondent was asked to numerically grade the severity of each variable of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System. Using the results, as well as limited input from the AOSpine Trauma Knowledge Forum, the Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score was developed. Results Beginning with 1 point for A1, groups A, B, and C were consecutively awarded an additional point (A1, 1 point; A2, 2 points; A3, 3 points); however, because of a significant increase in the severity between A3 and A4 and because the severity of A4 and B1 was similar, both A4 and B1 were awarded 5 points. An uneven stepwise increase in severity moving from N0 to N4, with a substantial increase in severity between N2 (nerve root injury with radicular symptoms) and N3 (incomplete spinal cord injury) injuries, was identified. Hence, each grade of neurologic injury was progressively given an additional point starting with 0 points for N0, and the substantial difference in severity between N2 and N3 injuries was recognized by elevating N3 to 4 points. Finally, 1 point was awarded to the M1 modifier (indeterminate posterolateral ligamentous complex injury). Conclusion The Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score is an easy-to-use, data-driven metric that will allow for the development of a surgical algorithm to accompany the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
对全球 100 位脊柱外科医生进行调查。目的:为 AOSpine 胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统开发脊柱损伤评分。方法:要求每位受访者对 AOSpine 胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统的每个变量进行数值分级。使用这些结果,以及 AOSpine 创伤知识论坛的有限输入,开发了胸腰椎 AOSpine 损伤评分。结果:从 A1 得 1 分开始,A、B 和 C 组依次获得 1 分(A1,1 分;A2,2 分;A3,3 分);然而,由于 A3 和 A4 之间严重程度显著增加,并且 A4 和 B1 的严重程度相似,因此 A4 和 B1 均被评为 5 分。从 N0 到 N4,严重程度呈不均匀的逐步增加,N2(神经根损伤伴根性症状)和 N3(不完全性脊髓损伤)损伤之间的严重程度有较大增加,因此,从 N0 的 0 分开始,每个神经损伤等级都逐渐增加 1 分,N2 和 N3 损伤之间的严重程度差异很大,将 N3 提升至 4 分。最后,M1 修饰符(不确定的后外侧韧带复合体损伤)获得 1 分。结论:胸腰椎 AOSpine 损伤评分是一种易于使用、基于数据的指标,将允许为 AOSpine 胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统制定手术算法。