Suppr超能文献

胸腰椎 AOSpine 损伤评分。

The Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catholic University, Curitiba, Brazil.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2016 Jun;6(4):329-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563610. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

Abstract

Study Design Survey of 100 worldwide spine surgeons. Objective To develop a spine injury score for the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System. Methods Each respondent was asked to numerically grade the severity of each variable of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System. Using the results, as well as limited input from the AOSpine Trauma Knowledge Forum, the Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score was developed. Results Beginning with 1 point for A1, groups A, B, and C were consecutively awarded an additional point (A1, 1 point; A2, 2 points; A3, 3 points); however, because of a significant increase in the severity between A3 and A4 and because the severity of A4 and B1 was similar, both A4 and B1 were awarded 5 points. An uneven stepwise increase in severity moving from N0 to N4, with a substantial increase in severity between N2 (nerve root injury with radicular symptoms) and N3 (incomplete spinal cord injury) injuries, was identified. Hence, each grade of neurologic injury was progressively given an additional point starting with 0 points for N0, and the substantial difference in severity between N2 and N3 injuries was recognized by elevating N3 to 4 points. Finally, 1 point was awarded to the M1 modifier (indeterminate posterolateral ligamentous complex injury). Conclusion The Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score is an easy-to-use, data-driven metric that will allow for the development of a surgical algorithm to accompany the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.

摘要

研究设计

对全球 100 位脊柱外科医生进行调查。目的:为 AOSpine 胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统开发脊柱损伤评分。方法:要求每位受访者对 AOSpine 胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统的每个变量进行数值分级。使用这些结果,以及 AOSpine 创伤知识论坛的有限输入,开发了胸腰椎 AOSpine 损伤评分。结果:从 A1 得 1 分开始,A、B 和 C 组依次获得 1 分(A1,1 分;A2,2 分;A3,3 分);然而,由于 A3 和 A4 之间严重程度显著增加,并且 A4 和 B1 的严重程度相似,因此 A4 和 B1 均被评为 5 分。从 N0 到 N4,严重程度呈不均匀的逐步增加,N2(神经根损伤伴根性症状)和 N3(不完全性脊髓损伤)损伤之间的严重程度有较大增加,因此,从 N0 的 0 分开始,每个神经损伤等级都逐渐增加 1 分,N2 和 N3 损伤之间的严重程度差异很大,将 N3 提升至 4 分。最后,M1 修饰符(不确定的后外侧韧带复合体损伤)获得 1 分。结论:胸腰椎 AOSpine 损伤评分是一种易于使用、基于数据的指标,将允许为 AOSpine 胸腰椎脊柱损伤分类系统制定手术算法。

相似文献

1
The Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score.
Global Spine J. 2016 Jun;6(4):329-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563610. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
2
The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system.
Eur Spine J. 2016 Apr;25(4):1087-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3982-2. Epub 2015 May 8.
5
The Subaxial Cervical AO Spine Injury Score.
Global Spine J. 2022 Jul;12(6):1066-1073. doi: 10.1177/2192568220974339. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
9
Is there a regional difference in morphology interpretation of A3 and A4 fractures among different cultures?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Feb;24(2):332-339. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE1584. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
10
Can a Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score Be Uniformly Applied from T1 to L5 or Are Modifications Necessary?
Global Spine J. 2015 Aug;5(4):339-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549035. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

2
Thoracolumbar Fractures: Historical Systems and Advancements With the AO Spine Classification.
Global Spine J. 2025 Aug 27:21925682251366981. doi: 10.1177/21925682251366981.
3
The AO Spine Knowledge Forums: A Decade of Impactful Spine Research.
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 8:21925682251343521. doi: 10.1177/21925682251343521.
6
Validating the Hierarchical Nature of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Spine Injury Classification System.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jul 15;50(14):956-964. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005297. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
7
[Indications for surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic spine and lumbar spine].
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Mar;128(3):156-166. doi: 10.1007/s00113-024-01518-x. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
8
Which is the Superior Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Tool? TLICS Versus AOSpine 2013: A Systematic Review.
Global Spine J. 2025 May;15(4):2536-2546. doi: 10.1177/21925682241311303. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
9
A computed tomography-based morphometric analysis of thoracic pedicles in a European population.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Oct 17;19(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05171-3.
10
Thoracolumbar injuries: prehospital and emergency management, imaging, classifications and clinical implications.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):1943-1949. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02658-w. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

本文引用的文献

6
Five-year clinical and radiological results of combined anteroposterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 May;20(5):497-504. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13246. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
8
AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 1;38(23):2028-37. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8a381.
9
10
AO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spine.
Eur Spine J. 2013 Oct;22(10):2184-201. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2738-0. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验