Ray Gautam
Consultant Gastroenterologist, Department of Medicine, B.R. Singh Hospital , Eastern Railway, Kolkata, West Bengal, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):OC01-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15487.7524. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
The exact prevalence of constipation in India is unknown. To know this, first it has to be properly defined based on stool frequency and form (as in western definition) in Indian patients, data on which is scarce. There may be difference with the western definition also.
To determine the stool frequency and form in patients consulting doctor for the complaint of constipation and compare these with the Western definition of constipation.
This was a prospective cross-sectional study on 331 consecutive patients seeking medical advice for their complaint of constipation. They were administered a questionnaire containing Rome III criteria points of functional constipation and constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome and the Bristol stool chart to report their predominant stool form. Organic bowel diseases were excluded by further history taking, physical examination and appropriate investigations. The data on stool frequency and form thus obtained were compared with the existing Indian population data.
A total of 65% patients were above 60 years of age. The predominant stool types were 1-3 according to Bristol stool form scale present in 93.8% patients and conformed to Asian criteria of constipation by stool form. Only 67.9% patients passed Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) type 1 and 2 stool which is the western definition. 51.5% reported a frequency of 3-4 motions/week, 19.8% had normal stool frequency by Indian standard (i.e. at least 1 motion/day) and only 35.4% had constipation by Western criteria (less than 3 motions/week). Hence subjective feeling varied widely from observed rate and Western definition was invalid in about twothird of patients. Feeling of incomplete evacuation was universal and this was referred to as constipation by patients. Functional constipation was diagnosed in 69.1% (of whom most were elderly with co-morbidities) and constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome in 13.8% by Indian standard. Only 2.1% had colonic cancer.
A stool frequency of <5 motions/week appears more appropriate in Indian definition of constipation where the subjective feeling of incomplete evacuation should also be given due weightage. Asian criteria based on stool form holds true in India.
印度便秘的确切患病率尚不清楚。要了解这一点,首先必须根据印度患者的排便频率和形态(如西方的定义那样)对其进行恰当定义,而这方面的数据很匮乏。这一定义可能也与西方的定义有所不同。
确定因便秘主诉前来就医的患者的排便频率和形态,并将其与西方的便秘定义进行比较。
这是一项对331例因便秘主诉前来寻求医疗建议的连续患者进行的前瞻性横断面研究。给他们发放了一份包含功能性便秘和以便秘为主型肠易激综合征的罗马Ⅲ标准要点以及布里斯托大便分类法的问卷,以报告其主要的大便形态。通过进一步询问病史、体格检查和适当的检查排除器质性肠道疾病。将由此获得的排便频率和形态数据与现有的印度人群数据进行比较。
共有65%的患者年龄在60岁以上。根据布里斯托大便形态量表,主要的大便类型为1 - 3型,93.8%的患者符合该类型,且根据大便形态符合亚洲便秘标准。只有67.9%的患者排出的是布里斯托大便量表(BSS)1型和2型大便,这是西方的定义。51.5%的患者报告每周排便3 - 4次,19.8%的患者按照印度标准排便频率正常(即每天至少排便1次),只有35.4%的患者符合西方标准的便秘(每周排便少于3次)。因此,主观感受与观察到的比率差异很大,西方定义在约三分之二的患者中无效。排便不尽感很普遍,患者将其称为便秘。按照印度标准,69.1%的患者被诊断为功能性便秘(其中大多数是患有合并症的老年人),13.8%的患者被诊断为以便秘为主型肠易激综合征。只有2.1%的患者患有结肠癌。
在印度对便秘的定义中,每周排便次数<5次似乎更为合适,同时排便不尽的主观感受也应予以充分重视。基于大便形态的亚洲标准在印度适用。