Dyson Michele P, Hartling Lisa, Shulhan Jocelyn, Chisholm Annabritt, Milne Andrea, Sundar Purnima, Scott Shannon D, Newton Amanda S
Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155813. eCollection 2016.
To conduct a systematic review of studies of social media platforms used by young people to discuss and view deliberate self-harm.
11 electronic databases were searched from January 2000 to January 2012 for primary research; in June 2014 an updated search of Medline was conducted. Grey literature sources were also searched. Search results were screened by two reviewers. Data were extracted by one reviewer and verified by another. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Due to heterogeneity in study objectives and outcomes, results were not pooled; a narrative analysis is presented. 26 studies were included. Most were conducted in Canada or the UK (30.8% each), used qualitative designs (42.3%), and evaluated discussion forums (73.1%). Participants were most often aged 19-21 years (69.2%), female (mean 68.6%), and 19.2% had a documented history of depression. The social media platforms evaluated were commonly supportive and provided a sense of community among users. Support included suggestions for formal treatment, advice on stopping self-harming behavior, and encouragement. Harms included normalizing and accepting self-harming behavior; discussion of motivation or triggers, concealment, suicidal ideation or plans; and live depictions of self-harm acts.
Although this evidence is limited by its descriptive nature, studies identify beneficial and detrimental effects for young people using social media to discuss and view deliberate self-harm. The connections users make online may be valuable to explore for therapeutic benefit. Prospective, longitudinal investigations are needed to identify short- and long-term potential harms associated with use.
对年轻人用于讨论和查看蓄意自伤行为的社交媒体平台研究进行系统综述。
从2000年1月至2012年1月检索了11个电子数据库以获取原始研究;2014年6月对Medline进行了更新检索。还检索了灰色文献来源。检索结果由两名评审员进行筛选。数据由一名评审员提取并由另一名评审员核实。使用混合方法评估工具评估方法学质量。
由于研究目标和结果存在异质性,未对结果进行汇总;进行了叙述性分析。纳入了26项研究。大多数研究在加拿大或英国进行(各占30.8%),采用定性设计(42.3%),并评估了讨论论坛(73.1%)。参与者最常见的年龄为19 - 21岁(69.2%),女性(平均占68.6%),19.2%有抑郁症记录史。所评估的社交媒体平台通常具有支持性,并在用户之间营造了一种社区感。支持包括正式治疗建议、停止自伤行为的建议以及鼓励。危害包括将自伤行为常态化和接受自伤行为;讨论动机或触发因素、隐瞒、自杀意念或计划;以及自伤行为的实时描述。
尽管这些证据受其描述性质的限制,但研究确定了年轻人使用社交媒体讨论和查看蓄意自伤行为的有益和有害影响。用户在网上建立的联系对于探索治疗益处可能很有价值。需要进行前瞻性的纵向调查以确定与使用相关的短期和长期潜在危害。