• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验性锥形头基台螺丝对种植体-基台界面微生物渗漏的影响:使用目标特异性 DNA 探针的体外分析。

Experimental conical-head abutment screws on the microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface: an in vitro analysis using target-specific DNA probes.

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, 14040-904, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):e68-e75. doi: 10.1111/clr.12876. Epub 2016 May 19.

DOI:10.1111/clr.12876
PMID:27198721
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this in vitro study was to identify and quantify up to 38 microbial species from human saliva penetrating through the implant-abutment interface in two different implant connections, external hexagon and tri-channel internal connection, both with conventional flat-head or experimental conical-head abutment screws.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-eight two-part implants with external hexagon (EH; n = 24) or tri-channel internal (TI; n = 24) connections were investigated. Abutments were attached to implants with conventional flat-head or experimental conical-head screws. After saliva incubation, Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization was used to identify and quantify up to 38 bacterial colonizing the internal parts of the implants. Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni's post-tests for multiple comparisons was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of thirty-eight species, including putative periodontal pathogens, were found colonizing the inner surfaces of both EH and TI implants. Peptostreptococcus anaerobios (P = 0.003), Prevotella melaninogenica (P < 0.0001), and Candida dubliniensis (P < 0.0001) presented significant differences between different groups. Means of total microbial count (×10 , ±SD) for each group were recorded as follows: G1 (0.27 ± 2.04), G2 (0 ± 0), G3 (1.81 ± 7.50), and G4 (0.35 ± 1.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in the geometry of implant connections and abutment screws have impacted the microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface. Implants attached with experimental conical-head abutment screws showed lower counts of microorganisms when compared with conventional flat-head screws.

摘要

目的

本体外研究旨在识别和量化通过两种不同种植体连接(外六边连接和三通道内部连接)穿过种植体-基台界面的人唾液中的 38 种微生物,两种连接均采用常规平头或实验性锥形头基台螺丝。

材料和方法

研究了 48 个带有外六边(EH;n=24)或三通道内部(TI;n=24)连接的两部分种植体。将基台用常规平头或实验性锥形头螺丝固定在种植体上。唾液孵育后,采用斑点杂交 DNA-DNA 技术识别和量化定植在种植体内部的多达 38 种细菌。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验 followed by Bonferroni 的 post-tests for multiple comparisons 进行统计学分析。

结果

在 EH 和 TI 种植体的内表面发现了包括潜在牙周病原菌在内的 38 种细菌中的 24 种。厌氧消化链球菌(P=0.003)、黑色素普雷沃菌(P<0.0001)和杜氏念珠菌(P<0.0001)在不同组之间存在显著差异。每组的总微生物计数(×10 ,±SD)平均值记录如下:G1(0.27±2.04)、G2(0±0)、G3(1.81±7.50)和 G4(0.35±1.81)。

结论

种植体连接和基台螺丝的几何形状差异影响了种植体-基台界面的微生物渗漏。与常规平头螺丝相比,用实验性锥形头基台螺丝固定的种植体显示出较低的微生物计数。

相似文献

1
Experimental conical-head abutment screws on the microbial leakage through the implant-abutment interface: an in vitro analysis using target-specific DNA probes.实验性锥形头基台螺丝对种植体-基台界面微生物渗漏的影响:使用目标特异性 DNA 探针的体外分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):e68-e75. doi: 10.1111/clr.12876. Epub 2016 May 19.
2
Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions.种植体-基台界面的唾液渗漏:三种不同种植体连接在非负重和负重条件下的体外评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):551-60.
3
Marginal fit and microbial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of fixed partial prostheses: An in vitro analysis using Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.固定局部义齿种植体-基台界面的边缘适合性和微生物渗漏:使用棋盘式DNA-DNA杂交的体外分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Dec;114(6):831-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.009. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
4
Mechanical comparison of experimental conical-head abutment screws with conventional flat-head abutment screws for external-hex and internal tri-channel implant connections: an in vitro evaluation of loosening torque.实验性锥形头基台螺丝与常规平头基台螺丝在外部六方和内部三通道种植体连接中的机械性能比较:松动扭矩的体外评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):e321-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3029.
5
In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of an external-hex implant after saliva incubation.唾液孵育后体外评估外六角种植体-基台界面的细菌渗漏情况。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):782-7.
6
Iodoform and silver-coated abutments preventing bacterial leakage through the implant-abutment interfaces: In vitro analysis using molecular-based method.使用分子生物学方法检测银碘仿涂层基台对种植体-基台界面细菌渗漏的影响:体外研究
Arch Oral Biol. 2019 Sep;105:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
7
Salivary bacterial leakage into implant-abutment connections: preliminary results of an in vitro study.唾液细菌渗入种植体-基台连接部位:一项体外研究的初步结果
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016 Jun;20(12):2476-83.
8
Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface: culture and DNA Checkerboard hybridization analyses.种植体-基台界面处的细菌渗漏:培养和 DNA checkerboard 杂交分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1168-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02280.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
9
The peri-implant sulcus compared with internal implant and suprastructure components: a microbiological analysis.种植体周围龈沟与种植体内部及上部结构部件的比较:微生物分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Dec;13(4):286-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00220.x. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
10
Different sealing materials preventing the microbial leakage into the screw-retained implant restorations: an in vitro analysis by DNA checkerboard hybridization.不同密封材料对防止微生物渗漏至螺丝固位种植体修复体中的作用:DNA棋盘杂交法的体外分析
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Feb;28(2):242-250. doi: 10.1111/clr.12790. Epub 2016 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative 3D Finite Element Computational Study of Three Connections.三种连接方式的三维有限元对比计算研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Sep 26;12(19):3135. doi: 10.3390/ma12193135.
2
Microleakage at the Different Implant Abutment Interface: A Systematic Review.不同种植体基台界面的微渗漏:一项系统评价
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZE10-ZE15. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28951.10054. Epub 2017 Jun 1.